#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stupid Law Academics
I came across this paragraph in my first week of Tax Law.
"...Without a theory you cannot explain why a Panda is not a bear, a whale is not a fish, or a tomato is not a vegetable. Moreover, you have no basis for arguing that professional wrestling is not a sport, that men should not be allowed to compete in synchronized swimming events, or about anything else that matters. Why would anyone suppose that the study of law is any different than these gripping issues?" -The Logic, Policy and Politics of Tax Law wtf? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid Law Academics
Tax law is trying to appeal to its much under-represented WWF demographic bracket.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid Law Academics
[ QUOTE ]
Tax law is trying to appeal to its much under-represented WWF demographic bracket. [/ QUOTE ] The brainless, clueless, iq=shoe size, shower once-a week, degenration X-ers. Just a thought, am i close? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid Law Academics
define theory obv
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid Law Academics
I have an advanced degree and certifications and blah blah.
Might as well be Chinese characters in the OP. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stupid Law Academics
[ QUOTE ]
I have an advanced degree and certifications and blah blah. Might as well be Chinese characters in the OP. [/ QUOTE ] the author is advocating studying theory instead of caving in to the students' demands for practical knowledge. however, none of the issues listed matter, nor are they gripping issues, nor are they issues remotely proximate to anything I have ever cared about, with the possible exception of the WWF. |
|
|