pick one

[mc123]

with these colors.

07 CLS 63 AMG

or

07 Vantage V8 Roadster

[n.s.]

The Aston Martin, of course. When in doubt, always spend the extra $15k.

Edit: wtf, the CLS is only available in an automatic? Definitely get the vantage.

['Chair]

vantage looks much classier.

[tom10167]

The Vantage will work well after 10,000 miles, and that's a nice thing to know.

EDIT: You're comparing 4 door saloons to two door convertibles, you know this right?

[theben]

if money is no object, aston martin and it isnt even close.

[mc123]

obv they are different class of car each with their pros but just wanted to see what people would prefer to buy generally if they could afford it

edit: Personally I think the styling of both cars have many similar aspects from the front and 3/4 views not only in pictures but also in person.

[RobBizzle]

[ QUOTE ]
The Vantage will work well after 10,000 miles, and that's a nice thing to know.

EDIT: You're comparing 4 door saloons to two door convertibles, you know this right?

[/ QUOTE ]


Are you saying that the Aston is going to be more reliable in the long run than the Benz? I don't think that would be the case. The build quality in Benz's has declined but as far as reliability i would put my money on the Benz. British cars are known for being unreliable.

[tom10167]

Mercedes' reputation has declined, and AM's has notably increased. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] The earlier DB9s had some minor issues but from what I understand most of the bigger issues are gone.(Realize that no car is flaw-free.)

Besides, what's it matter what a countries history is for carmaking? German cars are known for being solid right? Mercedes...

Even if they're equally unreliable, AM's a much more exclusive(read: cooler) car. Should be reason enough! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[gonebroke2]

If you get the benz, make sure you lease it. Expect the transmission to [censored] up after 6 months of ownership.

[Kmon]

roadster