Moneymaker vs. Raymer vs. Hachem

candyman718 · #1 01-10-2007, 01:20 AM

The opinion of most is that Moneymaker was a lucky goof and that Raymer and Hachem are much more skilled poker players. Nothing that I have seen would make me disagree with this. Out of curiousity, I decided to run their Pokerstars accounts through Sharkscope. Results:

Fossilman 96 games played @ $619/game Total -$5618 (tilt)
JoeHachem 29 games played @ $592/game Total -$2760
Money800 327 games played @$411/game Total + 6711

I know, I know, Small sample size, Donkaments lol, etc...
Just thought the results were interesting.

Wondercall · #2 01-10-2007, 01:36 AM

No they aren't.

Dan. · #3 01-10-2007, 03:21 AM

[ QUOTE ]
No they aren't.

[/ QUOTE ]

fluorescenthippo · #4 01-10-2007, 03:41 AM

dude they all suck at teh sit and goes

fjbourne · #5 01-10-2007, 04:10 AM

Hachem > Raymer > Moneymaker / endthread

StepBangin · #6 01-10-2007, 04:23 AM

5 Handed SNG for Rolls.

Hachem, Raymer, Moneymaker, Gold, Negreanu

duracell · #7 01-10-2007, 05:45 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Hachem > Raymer > My Baby Cousin > Moneymaker / endthread

[/ QUOTE ]

Suigin406 · #8 01-10-2007, 12:07 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No they aren't.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

KAknight · #9 01-10-2007, 12:19 PM

Honestly I think it goes Raymer > Hachem in tourneys.

JoeM · #10 01-10-2007, 12:37 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly I think it goes Raymer > Hachem in tourneys.

[/ QUOTE ]

Honestly I think if Hachem were a regular here you would say the opposite. Greg is a very good player, but this site is full of people swinging from his nuts. It gets kind of sickening.