POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?

[MrBellVaDeer]

PokerStars has over triple the amount of players that Full Tilt has but does that mean it is easier to win at??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I am think of switching to FULLTILE for better rakeback but, don't know if it is harder to win at [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] PLEASE HELP ME

[hra146]

what stakes you play?

I used to spent too much time figuring out at what sites the games are most soft. If you play < NL100 it doesnt matter anyway. Good table selection will do the job.

[thedarknight]

haha mcvickers!

[SoCalRugger]

[ QUOTE ]
what stakes you play?

I used to spent too much time figuring out at what sites the games are most soft. If you play < NL100 it doesnt matter anyway. Good table selection will do the job.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is probably the first time somone has actually given McVicker a serious answer.

[pokerpunchout]

PS = FT ... if you want soft hit Bodog or Prima

[TobDog]

I hear FullTile is great this time of year, new bonus, I think next Thursday.

[housenuts]

fulltile is futile

[grando]

just have 12 accounts at each

[Yakuman]

Full Tilt is a rock garden. Avoid.

[catalyst]

[ QUOTE ]
PS = FT ... if you want soft hit Bodog or Prima

[/ QUOTE ]

is bodog compatible with pt and pahud?