bbv, help me own this math proof

[Oxy]

I've always been loyal to BBV.

forgive me for bringing seriousness into this palace of crucial, but I need your help bbv.

I need help understanding bits of this proof (link again at the bottom) as well as trying to disprove Sklansky's proposition that poker has an unbeatable strategy (as he postulated in nl theory and practice). what it do.

aim: aimistotallycrap
msn: o2xy@hotmail.com

if anyone could help me, either post back here or contact me, please. would be appreciated.


bbv4life

ship it crucial, holla.

[Gildwulf]

if this is for an assignment, read BBV sticky...no doing your homework for you

[Oxy]

it's not for an assignment nor is it for school

[furyshade]

link to original sklansky thread?

edit: nevermind, didnt see it was a it was from NL TaP

[CrushinFelt]

beat: No reward offered

[FluffyTiger]

[ QUOTE ]
as well as trying to disprove Sklansky's proposition that poker has an unbeatable strategy

[/ QUOTE ]

um, not sure what Sklanksy's propositiion is, but is this refering to HU NL?

If so, how could you think otherwise?