Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2006, 01:59 AM
sailorman sailorman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 137
Default What is better for a new player.

I am about to stake one of my good friends $50 to play on either Pokerstars or Fulltilt. I have somewhat mentored him in the past month so he understands poker fairly well for the short time he has played.

He has more of a Sit and Go/Tournament background and has played many freerolls and several $1.75 turbos on Stars.

Firstly, is he better off playing Sit and Go's or Ring games?
Secondly, shorthanded or full.

Pokerstars would mean cash games, because they have .01-.02 NL games and .02-.05 NL shorthanded and full ring

Fulltilt offers $1.25 turbo sit and go's which have a 25% rake making them very tough to beat. Should he hop into the $2.25 sng's, and would it be best for turbo, regular or shorthanded for him.

Any advice everybody can offer me to help my friend get started in online poker would be much appreciated.

Thanks everyone and happy holidays.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2006, 02:04 AM
ckj ckj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 314
Default Re: What is better for a new player.

Neither. Send him to Golden Rivera so that he can clear a $50 dollar bonus with players way more terrible than at Full tilt. Then he can take that $100 bank roll and either continue to bonus whore or then choose between stars and full tilt.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2006, 08:23 AM
dlong226 dlong226 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 243
Default Re: What is better for a new player.

I would say play his strength and develop his SnG game. It will make it easier to transition to ring games once he grasps the fundamentals of the game.

also explain to him that things don't come easy and as he gets better, he realizes how much of a struggle it is
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2006, 03:20 PM
King Spew King Spew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,080
Default Re: What is better for a new player.

bonuswhore
rakeback
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2006, 04:26 PM
Nsight7 Nsight7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 496
Default Re: What is better for a new player.

Pokerstars all the way. The SnGs on Full Tilt for $1.25 are turbos primairly, which combined with rake makes them pretty high variance. The $2.25 are less on the rake, but make the amount of buy-ins he would have perhaps inadequate as a starting bankroll.

Yeah, I would roll with the cash games on PokerStars.
Of course you could always get him to deposit on Doyle's Room. The structures and buy-in's are pretty good for starting players with NL SnGs starting as low as .10 + .01 with 2000 starting chips and 8 minute blinds. Once you go to $1 + .10 games you can select 12 minute blinds as well. Consider it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2006, 04:59 PM
Elandriel Elandriel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 776
Default Re: What is better for a new player.

[ QUOTE ]
bonuswhore
rakeback

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-27-2006, 06:50 PM
AKQJ10 AKQJ10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hsv or the Tunica Horseshoe, pick one
Posts: 5,754
Default Re: What is better for a new player.

Getting started from the Beginners FAQ. Feel free to add to it, everyone.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.