![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What are your thoughts on the 18 man 60's?
Better or worse payout for the money compared to the greater precentage of player to beat? all thoughts???????? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They're softer in general, but it takes a while to get the skill down. They're sort of like an MTT at the end. More variance obv. And they don't go off that often sometimes.
Also stupid-ass Stars makes the HHs look just like a regular $60. So my Tourney Manager stats are all fried out from playing those things. I have to enter all my results with them manually, and it's still fried because of all the ones I dont make the money in that tourney manager has an error on, or thinks is a 9-man. I had to get a summary file from PS to find out my ROI over my last few K $60s. Haven't loaded it up in Excel and parsed it out yet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I play them fairly often. They don't go nearly as often as the 9 mans, so you can't play them exclusively. I see fewer regulars. My ROI is 2% higher than at the regular 55s, but sample size is probably too small to mean anything.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't answer your question, but I might start trying these out. Anything is better than running worse than any other 60 player alive. How often do they fill?
|
![]() |
|
|