Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2006, 01:15 AM
bpb bpb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 568
Default Wong Teasers

I claim that the following statement is true

"A 6 pt tease on an away team with a line of -9 to -7.5, or +2.5 to +3 is not profitable at +100-2team, +180-3team, or +300-4team."

Please refute this statement using statistics and historical data. Alternatively, please show why this statement is false in spite of historical data.

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-01-2006, 01:22 AM
Performify Performify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sports Betting forum
Posts: 3,847
Default Re: Wong Teasers

generally the burden of proof would be on you, making a statement opposite a generally held belief.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2006, 01:24 AM
goodsamaritan goodsamaritan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,465
Default Re: Wong Teasers

[ QUOTE ]
I claim that the following statement is true

"A 6 pt tease on an away team with a line of -9 to -7.5, or +2.5 to +3 is not profitable at +100-2team, +180-3team, or +300-4team."

Please refute this statement using statistics and historical data. Alternatively, please show why this statement is false in spite of historical data.

Thank you

[/ QUOTE ]

edit: nvm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2006, 01:29 AM
Performify Performify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sports Betting forum
Posts: 3,847
Default Re: Wong Teasers

This is different, as per Wong's sharp sports betting its a generally held belief that the opposite is true, that a 6-point tease on any team (regardless of home or away) that crosses the 7 and 3 is profitable at +100 2-team (or even -110 2-team).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2006, 01:33 AM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: Wong Teasers

[ QUOTE ]
I claim that the following statement is true

"A 6 pt tease on an away team with a line of -9 to -7.5, or +2.5 to +3 is not profitable at +100-2team, +180-3team, or +300-4team."

Please refute this statement using statistics and historical data. Alternatively, please show why this statement is false in spite of historical data.

Thank you

[/ QUOTE ]

Do your own homework.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:17 AM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: Wong Teasers

Agree. Many more spreads would fall on the 3 than the 2.5 and your loss of equity for spread on the three are busto compared to others.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:28 AM
Lori Lori is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In cyberspace, no-one can hear your sig.
Posts: 6,284
Default Re: Wong Teasers

[ QUOTE ]
I claim that the following statement is true

"A 6 pt tease on an away team with a line of -9 to -7.5, or +2.5 to +3 is not profitable at +100-2team, +180-3team, or +300-4team."

Please refute this statement using statistics and historical data. Alternatively, please show why this statement is false in spite of historical data.

Thank you

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd suggest you email this to Mansion.

Lori
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:35 AM
brendanb438 brendanb438 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Penalty Box at Covers
Posts: 2,636
Default Re: Wong Teasers

OP do your own damn research. These teasers have been money this year. Where are your numbers to backup your claim?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:39 AM
B00T B00T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,011
Default Re: Wong Teasers

This thread should be deleted before more people embaress themselves with crappy comebacks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2006, 03:05 AM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: Wong Teasers

I assume you are correct because you add -9 and +3, but why are you asking? I appreciate a good rhetorical question, but if you want to help you might as well make it as simple as possible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.