Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:28 PM
Habib Marwan Habib Marwan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: teh chark iss coaming
Posts: 740
Default Playing Against a Reraiser

Villain is lag and uses position well

Poker Stars
Pot Limit Omaha Ring game
Blinds: $2/$4
4 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $373.80
Hero: $438.10
SB: $256.70
BB: $337.05

Pre-flop: (4 players) Hero is Button with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $12</font>, Hero calls, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">BB raises to $32</font>, UTG folds, Hero calls, SB calls.

Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($108, 3 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">BB bets $74</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $328</font>,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:36 PM
zizazziza zizazziza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tort Feasing
Posts: 1,718
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

umm .. is this plo8? villian is OOP and i dont find a problem with calling this raise (marginal). The only thing that I would like to know is if he is able to get away from QQ- AA here. Either way its not terrible. But you are looking for a Q, 7, maybe a T is good but you dont know if he has QQK or something like that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:48 PM
Habib Marwan Habib Marwan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: teh chark iss coaming
Posts: 740
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

plo8, i believe minimally competent players can fold overpairs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:52 PM
zizazziza zizazziza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tort Feasing
Posts: 1,718
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

i think r/r is fine if u can narrow SB's hand range down. but i wouldnt hate calling either and getting it AI on turn
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2006, 02:05 AM
I dunno I dunno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waiting for a hit and run
Posts: 494
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

So are you putting him on AA a lot here? Yeah I could see this being proffitable if he can lay it down.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2006, 10:45 AM
bbartlog bbartlog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 882
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

but i wouldnt hate calling either and getting it AI on turn

Calling here rather than raising is a very bad idea. If villain has AAxx, we want to maximize our fold equity, since we're only about even for the high (12 outs to beat AA) and have no backdoor low. *And* if we're going to play this hand at all we should try to get it all in on the flop in any case, so that we're guaranteed to see two cards. Twelve outs in particular means that if the turn is bad for us (any low card other than [8]) then we wouldn't have odds to call a pot-sized turn bet from villain, so we'd be setting ourselves up to possibly get forced out of the hand. Raise is better than fold, but both are better than just calling here.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2006, 11:00 AM
I dunno I dunno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waiting for a hit and run
Posts: 494
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

Agreed, calling just encourages him to bet out again on the turn when a blank falls.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2006, 11:19 AM
zizazziza zizazziza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Tort Feasing
Posts: 1,718
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

this is the thing. im not necessarily puttin him on AA. I'm just saying that its a legitamite hand to have. You need to remember this is 4-handed. So for all you know he could have A234. Look @ the pf action. Its raise to 12 (12), call (24), call (36), and then bb with what would be (48) in the pot, instead of raising to $60, he raises to $32. THats a half-pot r/r which screams that he wants callers. So what im saying is that I usually wont cal there. But he is pretty much pot-committed if he has AA unless he think you have a straight or set. Also, If you just call you hav position on him on the turn as well and you can see what he does.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2006, 11:51 AM
bbartlog bbartlog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 882
Default Re: Playing Against a Reraiser

for all you know he could have A234

All the more reason to get him off his hand rather than let him try to draw another low card, if low is what he has.

As for him being pot-committed, I'm not sure I agree, but in this case letting him draw a card and seeing what he does on the turn is not such a good idea. As I pointed out, if a low card falls and we think he has AA, we will have to fold to a pot-sized turn bet (unless it's a spade or an eight).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.