|
|
#1
11-16-2006, 11:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
no lolobots allowed
2/4 ps
effective stacks 400 unknown utg (like 13/12 over 80 hands or something and probably 2p2 because everyone is 2p2) opens to $16, i call in bb with 8h8d flop Td5s4c i check, villain bets 24, i call turn 6c i bet 67, he calls river Ad i check (305 behind), villain bets 140, i push 
|
|
#2
11-16-2006, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
Ugh, just c/f river, or call if you want. Your push is practically a min-raise and I doubt he will fold a hand that beats yours.
|
|
#3
11-16-2006, 11:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
need to be deeper for this to be good i think. i also think AT is a good part of his range.
|
|
#4
11-16-2006, 11:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
yeah, i thought for a while and considered c/c too.
|
|
#5
11-16-2006, 11:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
[ QUOTE ]
need to be deeper for this to be good i think. i also think AT is a good part of his range. [/ QUOTE ] is raising AT utg typical? i dont do this
|
|
#7
11-16-2006, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
i don't really like c/c either since he would have to be bluffing specificaly missed clubs or 77 to try to get you to fold what looks like a ten. not really a bad card to bluff at, though. hard to say without playing with the guy.
|
|
#8
11-16-2006, 11:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] need to be deeper for this to be good i think. i also think AT is a good part of his range. [/ QUOTE ] is raising AT utg typical? i dont do this [/ QUOTE ] depends, i'll raise ATs if the table is playing tight enough.
|
|
#9
11-16-2006, 11:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no lolobots allowed
[ QUOTE ]
lol no way he is foldin for 165 more. [/ QUOTE ] yeah c/c is probably better than c/r
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
