Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2006, 11:49 PM
krupatime krupatime is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Default I have the answer

It seems to me that the recent legislation passed by congress is labile. How can it be that congress has the manque and ignorance to pass such dolorous legislation? Easy..they all know that what they do has no real significance to us or the 'real word.' Online poker sites operate with the intent of making money. That simple. Online poker is not going anywhere because we the people aren't going anywhere. The solution is to explain to the government that poker is a real thing. One that will not go anywhere. If we can get a representative or something to explain the SKILL involved then they will have no choice but to amend the law quickly. We must find an individual to represent our interests with the intent of changing what cannot be changed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2006, 12:22 AM
Nate tha\\\' Great Nate tha\\\' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: blogging
Posts: 8,480
Default Re: I have the answer

quit emunscipating and making up words. it makes you look like a schlutzzlefuss.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2006, 12:29 AM
JoseGonzlez JoseGonzlez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 801
Default Re: I have the answer

is labile a real world?
i was gonna look it up but bleh im lazy.
Leach acknowledged poker is a game of skillz. He dont care.
Guess it dont matter what he be thinking now but im sure Kyl has similar views as Leach.
Frist dont give a [censored] about gambling he just wants to be President.
So what i be saying is your whole point is largely irrelevant.
There are no reasons for politicians to come out strongly pro poker. Nothing really political to be gained.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2006, 12:42 AM
dragonystic dragonystic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Omelettes FTW
Posts: 1,075
Default Re: I have the answer

*whew* i was worried we'd never come up with a solution.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2006, 12:56 AM
Sean Fraley Sean Fraley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio, United States
Posts: 974
Default Re: I have the answer

[ QUOTE ]
quit emunscipating and making up words. it makes you look like a schlutzzlefuss.

[/ QUOTE ]

Both labile and dolorous are real words. In the event that you see a word and have no idea what it means, you might consider looking it up using Google's "define: [word]" function. Making accusations at someone with a better developed vocabulary than you makes you look like an ignoramus who can't engage his brain before opening his mouth.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2006, 01:07 AM
c5Nfold c5Nfold is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Default Re: I have the answer

So Sean......Have you not read any of the threads???? This is what we do in here. Ask anyone......If we can't call each other names, and run each other down, then darn it, it's just no fun at all. May as well just play poker ......
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2006, 01:11 AM
JoseGonzlez JoseGonzlez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 801
Default Re: I have the answer

the whole problem wit the post is he uses the huge words and yet his point is fairly basic and not valid.

strikes me as not even a serious post.

dont understand the point of using words that 99 percent of the population wont know. in general people do it cause their underlying point is weak.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:00 AM
ChexNFX ChexNFX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,187
Default Re: I have the answer

Forum regulars and trolls alike like to make new names are start obnoxious threads. Just, to see what happens and spice things up a tad. Before you all begin to get all riled up, please note the brand new registration and post count by Krupatime. Oh by the way Sean, this is Nate's forum.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-16-2006, 02:34 AM
Sean Fraley Sean Fraley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio, United States
Posts: 974
Default Re: I have the answer

My apologies for flying of the handle a bit there, but that kind of thing is a minor sore point with me. I come from a family of compulsive readers with overdeveloped vocabularies, and caught pretty much the same accusation the entire time I was growing up (though in retrospect I'll admit that it is a bit weird for a nine year old to use the word bailiwick in normal conversation). Again, I apologize if I offended anyone. With that out of the way, I will agree that the subject material of the original post was crap.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2006, 09:52 AM
bonds bonds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: drinking gallons of haterade
Posts: 2,461
Default Re: I have the answer

I have the question: "Huh?"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.