Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:37 PM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the fade
Posts: 1,314
Default NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

Just sat down and villian had a substantial stack. Normally I don't like to get involved with marginal hands in the first orbit or two.

I really feel like I mangled this hand. I cbet the flop and have no idea where I am on the turn so I check for pot control. It seems like villian sensed weakness and decided to take the pot away.

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
6 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) hellmouth is Button with J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">hellmouth raises to $1</font>, SB folds, BB calls.

Flop: J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($2.1, 2 players)
BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">hellmouth bets $1.7</font>, BB calls.

Turn: T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($5.5, 2 players)
BB checks, hellmouth checks.

River: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($5.5, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $4</font>, hellmouth folds.
Uncalled bets: $4 returned to BB.

Results:
Final pot: $5.5

Is this the standard default play on an unknown?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:40 PM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the fade
Posts: 1,314
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

Looking at villians possible hands now.

KQ easily beats me and might play this way on the turn checking to try for a check raise.

Any A also plays this similarly.

Finally villian might be on a busted flush draw and guessed that he can steal the pot based on my turn weakness.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:46 PM
Vern Vern is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Trying to understand SSHE
Posts: 2,185
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

I think the river bet is too big to call with second pair on this board. The ace hurts, the two straights hurt worse, I just cannot call a 3/4PSB on the river here with that holding.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:48 PM
CaucasianAsian29 CaucasianAsian29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beat: Santa Maria CA
Posts: 1,638
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

I'm really interested in this hand as well. This is how I normally play it, but don't know if it's the best way to play. I'm considering some type of small blocking bet on the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:53 PM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the fade
Posts: 1,314
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

A different hand where I play a similar line and feel now like I was just giving away $$$.

I am not sure I can call this bet even with the odds because I feel behind too often. Is this a bad fold?

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
6 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) hellmouth is UTG+1 with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">hellmouth raises to $1.25</font>, 3 folds, BB calls, UTG folds.

Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($2.85, 2 players)
BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">hellmouth bets $2</font>, BB calls.

Turn: 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($6.85, 2 players)
BB checks, hellmouth checks.

River: T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($6.85, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $2</font>, hellmouth folds.
Uncalled bets: $2 returned to BB.

Results:
Final pot: $6.85
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2006, 08:56 PM
pokerchap pokerchap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: selling cake money FO FREE
Posts: 2,345
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

hand1- i think it is the best way to play it. anything 1/2 pot or less im usually calling here.

hand 2- although he is betting less than 1/3 pot, you beat nothing here. good fold imo.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:03 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

QJs, I sometimes check these flops. No real need to bet. If you think about it, heart/Ace/sometimes other stuff nearly always call a bet. And after we check the turn, how do we narrow his range when he bets with the ace on the river and how often he bets a bluff like missed hearts? something to think about.

hand 2: looks fine.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:07 PM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the fade
Posts: 1,314
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

[ QUOTE ]
QJs, I sometimes check these flops. No real need to bet. If you think about it, heart/Ace/sometimes other stuff nearly always call a bet. And after we check the turn, how do we narrow his range when he bets with the ace on the river and how often he bets a bluff like missed hearts? something to think about.

hand 2: looks fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

So are you saying that with the scary board in hand one, it is worth not c-betting because on the turn if he checks again we can take it to showdown confidant that he doesn't have an ace?

I am not sure that I totally get your point orange, but I feel it might be a valuable tidbit.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:13 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

well, yeah, if we bet, his range is still extremely large (any hearts/ace/some sort of draw). we are going to check one of these streets (most likely), usually the turn. so instead of checking the turn, why not check the flop? kind've the same idea here:

you raise pf w. Ax on the button, bb calls. flop comes A74r, he checks, you should generally check behind here too. same type of thing here (though this board is my wetter than the example of A74r).

i'd actually prefer having a drier board for checking these flops, but nonetheless, i still check here sometimes. not saying always, but yeah.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2006, 09:18 PM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In the fade
Posts: 1,314
Default Re: NL25 6max FT QJs flops middle pair

[ QUOTE ]
well, yeah, if we bet, his range is still extremely large (any hearts/ace/some sort of draw). we are going to check one of these streets (most likely), usually the turn. so instead of checking the turn, why not check the flop? kind've the same idea here:

you raise pf w. Ax on the button, bb calls. flop comes A74r, he checks, you should generally check behind here too. same type of thing here (though this board is my wetter than the example of A74r).

i'd actually prefer having a drier board for checking these flops, but nonetheless, i still check here sometimes. not saying always, but yeah.

[/ QUOTE ]

That makes a lot of sense. I am assuming we want a drier board so that not many cards can muddle the picture on the turn and we are more confidant that we didn't give a free card to a draw that may now have come in?

Greg
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.