Sustainable 2/4 and 3/6 BB/100 on stars?

[berserk]

What win rates are sustainable with some game selection in the 2/4 and 3/6 stars 6 max games? I just started playing these games and am running well over my first 7k, so I'm wondering how far back down to earth I can expect to fall.

Does anyone sustain 3bb/100 in these games? 4bb/100?

[Leader]

No one knows this because no one plays 2/4 and 3/6 with a 3+ BB/100 win rate long enough to know if it's sustainable. I suspect it is if you play few tables and have good table/seat selection. Along, of course, with exceptional play.

[milesdyson]

i think 4 is doable with good table selection. doubtful you could 4 table and do it.

[inferno]

Dont become a BB/100 nit, you can play good and run 0-1BB/100 for thouzands of hands. If you run 3-5 you should be happy imo

[raytownloc]

my first 2500 at stars I am running over 5BB/100 at 1/2, 2/4, and 3/6. I have the same kind of feeling like this must inevitably turn around soon. Or are these guys just that bad? Would be curious to hear what people say about the difference between Stars and Party. I played 200,000+ hands at party and found it to be quite lucrative, but my win rate over that period was around 1.6BB/100 mostly at 2/4, 3/6, and 5/10

Would be content to be able to sustain a win rate of > 2BB /100... which I suspect is very possible.

[Disconnected]

The range of game levels you gave on Stars is lower than Party, and Stars also has lower rake at those limits, I think. So, if you were 1.6 BB over 200k at Party, I think you should be able to sustain 2 BB/100 at Stars at the same or lower stakes. Presumably, your game has improved over those 200k hands, as well. However, as Leader said earlier, you would probably find yourself moving up in stakes before you found out for sure.

[gehrig]

[ QUOTE ]
i think 4 is doable with good table selection. doubtful you could 4 table and do it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I COULD DO 6 ON 4