tiny petit pyttelitet pair in the big big blind

Rudis · #1 11-01-2006, 08:55 AM

It's going to be a 3-handed flop, IF you call/raise.

It was opened in the hijack by guy player A and rr from the co by a player B. You look down at a pp first you think it is the rockets, but then you realize it is just a measly pair of 4s, but now that you've already geared up since you thought it was Aces, the Fours look playable.

Player a is vpip: 25-35
pfr: 18-28
agg factor : 2-3

On a scale 1-10 where each increase is one in vpip and pfr and 0.1 in agg factor.

The same holds for player B.

What would A and B need to score on the 1-10 scale for you to look down at a hand with enough implied odds to play it?

mute · #2 11-01-2006, 08:57 AM

I fold, but I'm a nit.

Victor · #3 11-01-2006, 09:03 AM

i cap and i dont joke i am not joking.

Rudis · #4 11-01-2006, 09:15 AM

Hmm forgot the most important. You are either a ultratight 24/19 tag or a lagging 37/29. No I'm not joking, nothing inbetween.

Victor · #5 11-01-2006, 09:26 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Hmm forgot the most important. You are either a ultratight 24/19 tag or a lagging 37/29. No I'm not joking, nothing inbetween.

[/ QUOTE ]

i am always by the book tag.

Rudis · #6 11-01-2006, 08:37 PM

Is this too easy? Would someone mind telling me the easy answer?

HOWMANY · #7 11-01-2006, 08:44 PM

I think there might have been a discussion about something like this a couple months ago in a hand DD posted where he called 2 bets in the big blind with a small pair and nobody liked it.

Rudis · #8 11-01-2006, 08:47 PM

stox does it in a video.

Nate tha\\\' Great · #9 11-01-2006, 10:29 PM

[ QUOTE ]
stox does it in a video.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wasn't that in a BSB scenario? Here you're dealing with "legitimate" raises from the HJ and CO positions.

Rudis · #10 11-01-2006, 10:36 PM

that is correct. Still he does it purely on implied odds. Which he then realises he didnt get