Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:25 PM
ThunderEagle ThunderEagle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 498
Default JTs, MP, limper in front

UTG+1 is a little loose, and very passive both pre and post flop.

PokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB completes, BB checks.

Single limper in front, I'm trying to see a cheap flop.

Flop: (6 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, Hero calls, MP2 folds, CO folds, SB folds, BB calls.

I believe I should have raised this to help protect my hand. Everyone else folded anyhow.

Turn: (4.50 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, Hero ????
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:43 PM
tyler_cracker tyler_cracker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,661
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

raising the flop is crucial here.

there is no value in raising the turn; you're not going to fold both villains. plus, you can usually make up the extra bet anyway by raising the river if you hit one of your many outs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:47 PM
BigBadBabar BigBadBabar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: working on my 5k post yo
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

yeah tyler said it, easy flop raise

bbb
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2006, 07:55 PM
runnawaybus runnawaybus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 153
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

Raise this flop, but as played I would raise the turn here due to the added FD.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2006, 05:16 AM
Niediam Niediam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,269
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

[ QUOTE ]

there is no value in raising the turn; you're not going to fold both villains.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. We probably have the best hand here and the raise is for value and/or we increase our chances of winning the pot by having BB fold. I agree that it's very unlikely that both villians fold but I don't see why that should stop us from playing aggressively with a good hand...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2006, 05:38 AM
Yort Mada Yort Mada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: $10NL
Posts: 235
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

there is no value in raising the turn; you're not going to fold both villains.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. We probably have the best hand here and the raise is for value and/or we increase our chances of winning the pot by having BB fold. I agree that it's very unlikely that both villians fold but I don't see why that should stop us from playing aggressively with a good hand...

[/ QUOTE ]

yea, i agree. our hand went from good to probly better. i dont see any reason not to raise the flop and turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2006, 07:06 AM
SuLi SuLi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 45
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

Since UTG+1 is "very passive" I would expect to be behind and call the turn.

Flop raise is a must. Reaction from UTG+1 would have been interesting..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2006, 09:48 AM
ThunderEagle ThunderEagle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 498
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

I went ahead and raised the turn. I probably wouldn't have without the added flush draw.

BB Folded.

Villian just called.

River is a 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Villian checks, I bet, he calls.

Villian shows A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-28-2006, 01:16 PM
nach0king nach0king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 202
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

Grunch:

Raise the turn, you have excellent odds to make a flush and a decent chance at the top pair to win. If UTG+1 wasn't so loose postflop I'd advocate a fold but he might be protecting a drawing hand or it's possible he also has a jack. However with the possibility of a flush it's essential that you raise IMO.

(Having grunched I now read the other replies. Raising the flop didn't occur to me but that also makes sense.)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-28-2006, 02:48 PM
NIX NIX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: It\'s Sabotage
Posts: 1,762
Default Re: JTs, MP, limper in front

I agree with the flop raise, but I don't like a turn raise. If UTG+1 is very passive post flop, he's probably betting something strong and we won't lose him with a turn raise. If he has a monster, we may get 3bet which would be bad. If he doesn't have a monster, calling the turn and raising the river if we improve nets us 3 BB. Calling twice only loses us 2 BB if behind (and there is a good chance we are if UTG+1 is super passive).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.