Brag: Tecmo Super Bowl Beat Down

ajohnson16 · #1 10-25-2006, 05:38 AM

I've played this game very, very long, and I've never ever came close to an ass whooping on the computer like this, so I guess I'd brag about it. Should've been 89 too, but that one INT was a major overthrow by Simms [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Now I wish I wasn't a poor chump college student that sucks at poker so I could gambool on this game with 2p2ers. I'd like to see where I stand.

This was with no onside kicks either. I had like 6 or 7 safeties against them. LT, Pepper Johnson, and Gary Reasons = sick.

siccjay · #2 10-25-2006, 05:42 AM

standard

dboy23 · #3 10-25-2006, 05:44 AM

old football games are teh eazy.

ajohnson16 · #4 10-25-2006, 05:46 AM

I know TSB isn't hard by any means but I've never seen anyone get close to an 82-point win.

With the Raiders I've only been able to win by like 55 and thats running Bo for a score every play.

For some reason I just doubt that a lot of people get scores like this. I practically scored on every play I had the ball.

blackjack777 · #5 10-25-2006, 05:48 AM

I spent MONTHS of my life, maybe close to a year, playing Super Tecmo Bowl on the SNES.

Did you notice, that you could usually go 15-1 during the season, but there was always this one game where like, Thurman Thomas would go off like a crack horror on you, and you would fumble every other play, and get beat?

Maybe it was just me.

ajohnson16 · #6 10-25-2006, 05:50 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I spent MONTHS of my life, maybe close to a year, playing Super Tecmo Bowl on the SNES.

Did you notice, that you could usually go 15-1 during the season, but there was always this one game where like, Thurman Thomas would go off like a crack horror on you, and you would fumble every other play, and get beat?

Maybe it was just me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, IIRC, Tecmo is coded to have teams get harder the farther down the season you go with a good record. I have gone undefeated before, it just took a lot of work and luck.

blackjack777 · #7 10-25-2006, 05:53 AM

Looking at that box score there, you ran Otis Anderson three times? And Simms only completed 57 percent? Weak.

But nice score.

ajohnson16 · #8 10-25-2006, 05:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Looking at that box score there, you ran Otis Anderson three times? And Simms only completed 57 percent? Weak.

But nice score.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh, once I put up 23 in the first quarter I was going to try and score as much as I could (running=takes longer then passing to score on).

57% isn't great but when there really isn't much one can do to help complete a pass to a wide open receiver I'll take it.

blackjack777 · #9 10-25-2006, 06:07 AM

Yes, I understand about the running.

Otis Anderson should have run zero times.

That is the balla thing to do, throw on every down.

J_V · #10 10-25-2006, 06:55 AM

I scored 100 but I forgot which one, where the vikings had that f'ed up playbook with the reverses.