North American Union formed by Bush

[Mempho]

I heard about this on another board and I'm going to post the OP's post verbatim. G. Gordon Liddy did a segment on this today saying that it was gonna hurt the Republican Christian vote.

See Lou Dobbs and P. Buchanan's comments from the links below from the OP. This is news to me and absolutely staggering.

SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME THIS ISN'T TRUE

[ QUOTE ]
In case you don't know, http://www.humanevents.com is an extremely conservative site...


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965North American Union to Replace USA?

by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 19, 2006

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965North American Union to Replace USA?

Other sources:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAeEc...ed&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kjsy2Z3kdI

Here's Pat Buchannan on this -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXm7B...ed&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDA1d...ed&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Aok...ed&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XMz8...ed&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaZSB...amp;search=<br />
[/ QUOTE ]

[Mempho]

More:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0060331-1.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=52576

[BluffTHIS!]

Ahh the CFR. He should have mentioned the Trilateral Commission as well. Rats, it's just too bad the constitution gives the president such far-reaching power to force political union with other countries on the nation without Congress' and the states' consent. But I guess if it required a constitutional ammendment he would just declare martial law.

[JackWhite]

[ QUOTE ]
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

[/ QUOTE ]

His administration, as well as almost every President in the last 80 years, is full of CFR members. It is a virtual requirement to get a job in the State Department. No surprise that their policy goals are being implemented.

[Mempho]

[ QUOTE ]
Ahh the CFR. He should have mentioned the Trilateral Commission as well. Rats, it's just too bad the constitution gives the president such far-reaching power to force political union with other countries on the nation without Congress' and the states' consent. But I guess if it required a constitutional ammendment he would just declare martial law.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not following you, Bluff. Are you saying that I've fallen for a conspiracy theory? I hope so.

[PLOlover]

[ QUOTE ]
he would just declare martial law.

[/ QUOTE ]

Already been done sir. Already been done. Time will tell what they will do with the power.

[hmkpoker]

I would like every Canadian and Mexican reading this to know that we are bad people, we hate ourselves, we hate you, and we smell.

[BluffTHIS!]

My main objections to such a north american union is first that the canadians will insist on making the british monarch our collective titular head of state meaning we have to have that 80 year old woman's picture on our money and stamps when we fought a revolution to shed the monarchy. And secondly the mexicans will demand that Poncho Villa's birthday be a national holiday when we sent troops to kill that guy. Plus they might even makes us accept some mariachi music as our national anthem. But my third objection is the real deal killer, which is having to include Quebec. If we could exclude those whiny francophone [censored] then I might consider it.

[evil twin]

[ QUOTE ]
If we could exclude those whiny francophone [censored] then I might consider it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, nice. Obviously you're "joking". Try making that comment about some other group of people and watch yourself get banned.

[PLOlover]

[ QUOTE ]
My main objections to such a north american union is first that the canadians will insist on making the british monarch our collective titular head of state meaning we have to have that 80 year old woman's picture on our money and stamps when we fought a revolution to shed the monarchy. And secondly the mexicans will demand that Poncho Villa's birthday be a national holiday when we sent troops to kill that guy. Plus they might even makes us accept some mariachi music as our national anthem. But my third objection is the real deal killer, which is having to include Quebec. If we could exclude those whiny francophone [censored] then I might consider it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you think NAFTA, CAFTA, and GATT are conspiracy theories too?