#1
|
|||
|
|||
200-400 PLO 255k pot
lfisgd (brad booth) has 3478 double suited.
how (un)standard is this? http://www.pokerhand.org/?573412 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
aren't there like 6 forums this should be in before this one
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
yes and the way the hand played out, he had odds the whole way.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
Best hand won pf.
Results: Omaha Hi: 376992 enumerated boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Ac Ah Th 7h 34003 9.02 299651 79.48 43338 11.50 0.148 As Ts Ad 9d 77171 20.47 256483 68.03 43338 11.50 0.262 7s 3s 8c 4c 125901 33.40 251091 66.60 0 0.00 0.334 Ks Qs Qh Jh 96579 25.62 280413 74.38 0 0.00 0.256 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
The KQQJ guy was the dumass, and the one who provided a lot of equity to the 8743ds hand. Without that guy, one of the AA hands has the better equity allin preflop, though barely and because he was double suited:
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2145478 pokenum -mc 500000 -o ac ah th 7h - as ts ad 9d - 7s 3s 8c 4c Omaha Hi: 500000 sampled boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV Ac Ah Th 7h 59234 11.85 290585 58.12 150181 30.04 0.269 As Ts Ad 9d 117017 23.40 234540 46.91 148443 29.69 0.382 7s 3s 8c 4c 173568 34.71 324573 64.91 1859 0.37 0.349 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
he isnt a dumb as s....
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
His play in that hand proves otherwise. And your maintaining otherwise says something about your knowledge of PLO no matter how much you might win at what high stakes. I could explain why that was so, but instead will allow you to explain first why his going allin with KQQJ was a good play.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
2 hands were telegraphed...
edit: 2.5 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
look @ the ev calc n thats w/ both his fd's covered
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200-400 PLO 255k pot
Looks pretty standard.
|
|
|