No more AC for me

Dr. Strangelove · #1 10-23-2006, 03:03 AM

I've never ignored anyone on these forums until today. I've always thought it a sign of weakness. But I've read their arguments many times and I think they've been routed pretty thoroughly. I don't need to reread them anymore.

Additionally, they are world class thread derailers. They inject AC into almost every thread in this forum no matter the relevance. This is trolling in my book. I'm putting them all on ignore.

So question: Are you an anarchocapitalist?

WillMagic · #2 10-23-2006, 03:04 AM

OMG DRAMABOMB

evil twin · #3 10-23-2006, 04:00 AM

[ QUOTE ]
They inject AC into almost every thread in this forum no matter the relevance.

[/ QUOTE ]
Sadly this is true.

New001 · #4 10-23-2006, 04:34 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They inject AC into almost every thread in this forum no matter the relevance.

[/ QUOTE ]
Sadly this is true.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with many of the AC arguments, but it does get ridiculous at times. Moderating it would be stupid in my opinion, but does every thread discussing any current aspect of government, voting, political parties, rice bowls, etc. need an "lol government" type response? Does "jackbooted thugs" need to appear in every thread?

It just gets really old.

madnak · #5 10-23-2006, 08:02 AM

[ QUOTE ]
So question: Are you an anarchocapitalist?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes.

Nielsio · #6 10-23-2006, 09:00 AM

bkholdem · #7 10-23-2006, 09:45 AM

Is it wrong to question authority?

Is it wrong to question the logic behind arguments people make and them be suspicious when people do not come back to defend their postions by answering tough questions.. but go on to spout off rhetoric in other threads?

Dan. · #8 10-23-2006, 11:41 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Is it wrong to question authority?

Is it wrong to question the logic behind arguments people make and them be suspicious when people do not come back to defend their postions by answering tough questions.. but go on to spout off rhetoric in other threads?

[/ QUOTE ]

When it's specifically to advance the AC agenda at the cost of discussion? Yes.

bkholdem · #9 10-23-2006, 11:53 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is it wrong to question authority?

Is it wrong to question the logic behind arguments people make and them be suspicious when people do not come back to defend their postions by answering tough questions.. but go on to spout off rhetoric in other threads?

[/ QUOTE ]

When it's specifically to advance the AC agenda at the cost of discussion? Yes.

[/ QUOTE ]

And when it is to clarify the rationale behind/feasibility of another posters assertions?

hmkpoker · #10 10-23-2006, 12:09 PM

Without the ACists (and without some far-leftists like moorobot and propertarian), this forum is devoid of discussions on political theory, and is nothing more than blanket criticisms of policies or politicians without an examination as to why they are wrong.

Enjoy your "OMG I HATE BUSH" threads.