#1
|
|||
|
|||
Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
I suppose it's a choice between "worth a flutter" or in need of "regulation". Although I'm not sure what worth a flutter actually means. Must be a British expression. All I know is we can't let the voters who say it's for suckers win!
http://www.netfreedom.org/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
flutter = a smallish bet
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
LOL - thanks Mike. Seems that poll is a bit bias towards anti gambling. It needs GOOD votes!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
Flutter then?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
terrible poll. nice to see flutter is winning.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
Did someone rig this for "worth a flutter"? They got the last 100 votes, which seems highly improbable. "For suckers" got zero votes in the last ten hours, after leading from the start.
Way to go! Whos the sucker now? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
[ QUOTE ]
Did someone rig this for "worth a flutter"? They got the last 100 votes, which seems highly improbable. "For suckers" got zero votes in the last ten hours, after leading from the start. Way to go! Whos the sucker now? [/ QUOTE ] I imagine it got the last hundred votes because they all came from this site. And the poll itself has hardly any votes at all so one not getting voted for for 10 hours is hardly out of the ordinary. Also, its some crappy blog, so it doesnt really matter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Online gambling survey gone bad. Better vote fast
I was hoping I could choose that online gambling is "in need of a fluffer."
|
|
|