Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2006, 05:58 PM
Precise919 Precise919 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Raleigh,NC
Posts: 129
Default AJ line check vs TAG

i am usually toast here right? any other way to play this?

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.50/$1
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $108.70
CO: $175.75
Button: $78.50
SB: $133.65
BB: $27.10

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is UTG with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $4</font>, CO folds, Button calls, 2 folds.

Flop: 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($9.5, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $6.25</font>, Button calls.

Turn: 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($22, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $14.5</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises to $45</font>, Hero folds.
Uncalled bets: $30.5 returned to Button.

Results:
Final pot: $51
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:01 PM
TDouble TDouble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: working for the man = teh suck
Posts: 1,022
Default Re: AJ line check vs TAG

I know this won't go over well but this is the second post I've seen you make about a really standard hand. Perhaps you should move down a limit until these become eaiser to play.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:10 PM
FastPlaySlow FastPlaySlow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: AMERICA
Posts: 779
Default Re: AJ line check vs TAG

Yeah, I'm not seeing much that you're beating on the turn. I believe this is a fold on the turn, it really feels like he has some kind of two pair or a set.

You can probably check the turn, and try to get a cheap showdown. Maybe check/call the turn, and block bet the river? Bet less on the turn maybe for pot control? Like 10-11$ ish?

I don't think moving down will make these hands easier to play. I think studying more and getting reads will.

Play at whatever level you want to, and keep posting hands that you have questions about.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:11 PM
Precise919 Precise919 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Raleigh,NC
Posts: 129
Default Re: AJ line check vs TAG

no offense taken... he just decided to show me his K10 after hand, so i was second guessing myself... but i guess thats being too results oriented.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:11 PM
74o_Clownsuit 74o_Clownsuit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I FIGHT VAMPIRES
Posts: 1,557
Default Re: AJ line check vs TAG

Baluga Theorem
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:15 PM
74o_Clownsuit 74o_Clownsuit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I FIGHT VAMPIRES
Posts: 1,557
Default Re: AJ line check vs TAG

[ QUOTE ]
no offense taken... he just decided to show me his K10 after hand, so i was second guessing myself... but i guess thats being too results oriented.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, that's being results oriented.

Also, that's a BIG mistake on his part to show you that hand. Now you know he likes to float and make some pretty bad "semibluffs". I still think you shouldn't stack off with something like TPGK against him, but be sure to let him hang himself in a future hand.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:30 PM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: AJ line check vs TAG

Nice hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.