pokerstars

mupo · #1 10-14-2006, 05:25 AM

has pokerstars gotten easier with the influx of all the players from the banned sites?

edfurlong · #2 10-14-2006, 05:29 AM

Yeah, three minutes after is probably a good time to ask. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Push_Fold · #3 10-14-2006, 05:51 AM

Super easy today. At 50NL my winrate was 37ptBB/100. Must be the Party donks donating it up at PS.

ThunderEagle · #4 10-14-2006, 08:12 AM

I had a good night last night, but I'll chalk it up to variance, and a couple of maniacs.

alphamale1 · #5 10-14-2006, 09:12 AM

why even play there? No rakeback. crappy rewards.

iH8poker · #6 10-14-2006, 11:15 AM

[ QUOTE ]
why even play there? No rakeback. crappy rewards.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a ton of reasons to disagree with this statement...but then again I sometimes wonder the same thing about Fulltilt...

I knew a massive 'let's diss stars like we did party' was going to happen, even though stars is 2 to 3 times better site. If you only get 25% rakeback at Fulltilt, I would rather play at stars myself.

flafishy · #7 10-14-2006, 04:43 PM

For one thing, game and table selection is much better at Stars than at Full Tilt. For another reason, Stars' software is much more stable and doesn't have the connection issues you get a lot of times with FT.

MicroBob · #8 10-14-2006, 04:45 PM

This is definitely an issue with me.

With PA-Hud and PT running I really have problems with FT sometimes.
Almost NEVER have a problem at Stars.

RikaKazak · #9 10-14-2006, 05:02 PM

[ QUOTE ]
This is definitely an issue with me.

With PA-Hud and PT running I really have problems with FT sometimes.
Almost NEVER have a problem at Stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

I actually timed out of a $1,000 pot once with the second nuts because of that at tilt [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] (I had K high flush...and 95% sure I was good)

At stars, it's NEVER a problem.

aucu · #10 10-14-2006, 05:38 PM

I'm 95% happy with the way Stars works,

Thats good enough for me.