![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am reading contradictory articles about this. Some say ISPs are required to block access to internet gaming sites. Other articles make no mention of this. This is a huge issue if it were true.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ISPs are not required to block access to Internet gambling sites under this law. Gambling sites are barred fro accepting wagers from U.S. computers/residents, but it is unclear if this actually can be enforced.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt they would spend the amount of money it would take to have every gaming site blocked. Also, as far as I know they dont even have child pornography sites blocked by ISPs and that is something even our extremely conservative religious friends would find reprehensible.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was something that was being bandied about in the Goodlatte bill, I believe. Not this one.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ISPs are not required to block access, but some sites are planning to IP-ban US customers of their own accord (read: Party).
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is nothing about blocking access to Internet sites. If they did that, the First Amendment would come into play and the negative publicity backlash would help us quite a bit.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is language in the bill concerning hosting "links" to gambling sites but not IP blocking.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think an injunction can come from US district court saying an "interactive computer service" must remove or block access to an online site that violates the pending bill.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there is no need to worry about that. Please read this:
http://www.cardplayer.com/poker_law/article/1446 Best regards eigenvalue |
![]() |
|
|