Pinnacle Pulse 9/27

[NoChance]

Article

Until recently, sharp players routinely turned a profit using very little handicapping and simply playing underdogs. Blindly betting every home dog of +7.5 or more during NFL season became a staple that regularly cashed at the window. Then this traditional handicapping technique stopped working to the point that these “bread and butter” plays no longer brought home the bacon. In 2005, the “Sharps 101 playbook” was rewritten as favorites covered 58% of the time.

Although it’s only the fourth week of the season, at Pinnacle Sportsbook we’ve noticed that this trend may reestablish itself as good teams dominate. Teams that are 2-1 or 3-0 are a combined 32-12 (72.73%) against the spread. With underdogs of 10 or more points only covering 1/3 of games this season it certainly brings league parity into question.

There’s always been a gap between the “haves” and “have nots” in the NFL. Prior to the 2002 season, this gap was bridged by scheduling four games for each team based on the previous year’s performance. If a team finished last in its division, the “crème puff” factor dictated that it would get four games against equally bad teams.

Since 2002, new NFL scheduling rules dictate that only two games per year would be based on a team’s record from the preceding year. As a result, today’s NFL schedule now contains more games between mismatched teams than before. Consequently, bad teams lose more games while good teams win more often.

This was extremely evident last year when only 1 of 32 teams finished with an 8-8 record. With the ever-growing number of underdog players and more mismatches, there are now profitable opportunities to do what was previously unthinkable - back quality teams as large favorites. Since there are several underdog players at Pinnacle Sportsbetting, which also offers up to 60% better odds on NFL sides, there’s often great value to be found betting favorites.

One way to evaluate a team is to look at its offensive yards per play and the defensive yards allowed per play. As one would expect, teams that gain more yards than they allow tend to win. While this isn’t exclusively accurate, this measure is at least as good a predictor of future performance as past game scores. Using the Internet and Excel, you can easily evaluate the entire league in just a few minutes. Scraping data and analyzing it in Excel is a mandatory skill for successful handicappers, so it’s worthwhile to provide a brief example of how simple it is.

Under the “Stats” section on NFL.com simply select “2005 regular season”. At the bottom of the page under “Sortable team rankings”, there are “Offense” and “Defense” options. Simply clicking the “Find stats” button after selecting total offense or defense, will give a number of statistics for every NFL team including offensive/defensive yards per play (Y/P).

Copy the offensive and defensive yards per play into an Excel spreadsheet sorted for each team’s individual stats. Then simply subtract the defensive yards per play from the offensive yards per play. If the “A” column is the team, and “B and C” are offensive and defensive yardages respectively, use the formula “=b1-c1” in column D. This will give a “yardage differential” for each team, which if positive, indicates a team that gains more yardage on offense than it surrenders. If done correctly, the spreadsheet should look like this:

** To see this chart, click the link above. I can't get it to post properly. **

The four worst teams in terms of yardage per play differential in 2005 were San Francisco, Houston, Buffalo and Detroit, while the four best were the New York Giants, Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Seattle. Betting lines often fail to adequately reflect the difference between the elite teams compared to the dregs. The top four were 6-2-1 against the spread and 9-0 straight up in 2005 against the bottom four.

While these results aren’t surprising, a yardage differential can also be used to analyze match-ups between nearly any two teams. There’s a “quick and dirty” rule for setting a spread using NFL yardage differential: each 0.15 yards per play is worth 1 point. As an example, let’s examine Monday’s game of Green Bay at Philadelphia.

According to NFL.com, the Eagles are gaining 6.7 yards per play this season, while allowing 5.0 yards per play – a differential of +1.7. The Packers are gaining 5.4 Y/P, while allowing 5.9 Y/P, for a net differential of -0.5. The Eagles’ net differential is 2.2 better; dividing by 0.15 suggests the Eagles should be about a 14.5 point favorite on a neutral field.

As with all tools for evaluating teams, this calculation is best used in conjunction with other handicapping methods and using common sense. Many statistical methods become far more viable after 4-6 games so the current season’s data can be analyzed. However, even at this early stage, these types of statistical methods can be a good way to look for new winning angles – like identifying under-priced big favorites.


What are players betting at the Pinnacle Online Sportsbook?

Ohio State (-7 +103) at Iowa

We initially offered the Buckeyes at -6.5 (-105) and took early public money. Ohio State has been a high-profile team for several years and continues to attract a lot of attention. If OSU wins this game, they face only one more top-25 team this season – at home versus rival Michigan. With major BCS ramifications on the line, this game has split opinion between the public and the sharps, with the professionals backing Iowa.

Georgia Tech +9 -104 at Virginia Tech

Virginia Tech has a reputation as a team that starts strong but tends to fade midseason. They struggled against Cincinnati last week, trailing 10-5 at halftime before rallying with 17 fourth quarter points to win 29-13. None of the Hokies’ wins have been against quality opponents and bettors are punishing them for this. Virginia Tech opened at -13, which was quickly bet down to -9 by the public who favors Georgia Tech.

Indianapolis Colts -9 +100 at New York Jets

This line opened with Indianapolis giving 7.5 points where early bettors forced the line to -9. Despite moderately balanced action, there have been more wagers on the Colts, although the early wise guys clearly favor the Jets.

New England +6 -110 at Cincinnati Bengals

The undefeated Bengals are riding high following their road victory against the defending Super Bowl Champions, while the Patriots are reeling from a 17-7 home loss to Denver. The Pats opened getting 4 points and although they haven’t been bigger underdogs since 2004, the Bengals backing has been surprising. The sharps have been fairly split on this game – playing the Bengals at -4 and taking the Patriots at +6.

[almostbusto]

[ QUOTE ]

Ohio State (-7 +103) at Iowa

We initially offered the Buckeyes at -6.5 (-105) and took early public money. Ohio State has been a high-profile team for several years and continues to attract a lot of attention. If OSU wins this game, they face only one more top-25 team this season – at home versus rival Michigan. With major BCS ramifications on the line, this game has split opinion between the public and the sharps, with the professionals backing Iowa.


[/ QUOTE ]

seems like this forum (myturntoraise most notably) seems to really be backing OSU. yet pinny claims the pros are backing Iowa. as someone who put more units than i probably should have on this game, should i be concerned?

[Performify]

Heh, gotta love watching the money move in after these get published. Colt's line moved 3c right away...

[bigalt]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Ohio State (-7 +103) at Iowa

We initially offered the Buckeyes at -6.5 (-105) and took early public money. Ohio State has been a high-profile team for several years and continues to attract a lot of attention. If OSU wins this game, they face only one more top-25 team this season – at home versus rival Michigan. With major BCS ramifications on the line, this game has split opinion between the public and the sharps, with the professionals backing Iowa.


[/ QUOTE ]

seems like this forum (myturntoraise most notably) seems to really be backing OSU. yet pinny claims the pros are backing Iowa. as someone who put more units than i probably should have on this game, should i be concerned?

[/ QUOTE ]

how do they distinguish the two? betting history? bet size?

[calmB4storm]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Ohio State (-7 +103) at Iowa

We initially offered the Buckeyes at -6.5 (-105) and took early public money. Ohio State has been a high-profile team for several years and continues to attract a lot of attention. If OSU wins this game, they face only one more top-25 team this season – at home versus rival Michigan. With major BCS ramifications on the line, this game has split opinion between the public and the sharps, with the professionals backing Iowa.


[/ QUOTE ]

seems like this forum (myturntoraise most notably) seems to really be backing OSU. yet pinny claims the pros are backing Iowa. as someone who put more units than i probably should have on this game, should i be concerned?

[/ QUOTE ]

[miami32]

I think OSU is a solid play. Although, I'm not sure how I feel about a sportsbook news letter. So who knows. I def. like Indy though, I know that much.

[Performify]

[ QUOTE ]
how do they distinguish the two? betting history? bet size?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and yes. Books definitely know pretty quickly who are the sharps and who are the squares.

[Performify]

[ QUOTE ]
seems like this forum (myturntoraise most notably) seems to really be backing OSU. yet pinny claims the pros are backing Iowa. as someone who put more units than i probably should have on this game, should i be concerned?

[/ QUOTE ]

#1 - I wouldn't make wagering decisions solely on Pinnacle Pulse in a million years

#2 - Even if you are on the wrong side of the "pros", the pros are only on the right side 60% of the time at most, so you're not that far behind. And if you look at most "pros" last year, they were right about 40% of the time. Its not worth worrying about tremendously.

#3 - Go with your handicapping, and with your instinct. If you're honestly worried about it, becuase information has changed since you first placed your bet (thank you Madden Curse), or becuase of a general feeling of unease that stems from deep inside, believe in that. But if you're only getting worried because of what you read in Pinnacle Pulse, disregard completely.

My $0.02

[beetman]

Pinnacle actually opened Ohio St -3 -105 but I guess they didn't want to draw attention to how weak their openers are.

One of the big factors Pinnacle uses to assess the sharpness of their bettors is how often the bettor beats the closing line.

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Ohio State (-7 +103) at Iowa

We initially offered the Buckeyes at -6.5 (-105) and took early public money. Ohio State has been a high-profile team for several years and continues to attract a lot of attention. If OSU wins this game, they face only one more top-25 team this season – at home versus rival Michigan. With major BCS ramifications on the line, this game has split opinion between the public and the sharps, with the professionals backing Iowa.


[/ QUOTE ]

seems like this forum (myturntoraise most notably) seems to really be backing OSU. yet pinny claims the pros are backing Iowa. as someone who put more units than i probably should have on this game, should i be concerned?

[/ QUOTE ]

never place too many units on one game

there is a huge difference of opinion on this game

My line of thinking matches that of the guys who break game films down and analyze match-ups (ie guys like Todd McShay and Tom Lugenbill on ESPNU)

the power rankings go with Iowa for the most part. 'Professionals' are big into Intangibles and Iowa's home ATS record. An Iowa argument is presented here halfway down the page.
Hell, Fezzik posted that he thinks Iowa will win outright on the thread I started over at his site after he posted IOWA +7 as one of his first picks.


My opinion is already well known: <font color="white">The most overrated team in the nation gets exposed</font>.

Go with whoever, but the lesson is to never have too many units on one game. As performify pointed out, even someone with a great edge in sports betting is only 60% or thereabouts to win.

If it makes you feel better, tOSU this weekend is the biggest play I've ever made, but it's still just below 5% of my bankroll.

EDIT: reading the 'pros' over at therx, everyone is braggin up Drew Tate and his experience, leadership, etc.
My opinion is that none of these guys have watched Tate throw the ball the last few weeks. ZERO plays downfield...NONE....NADA....ZILCH. Either his receivers suck (widely acknowledged to be true) or his injury has affected him (some speculation here). That wounded duck he threw with the wind at Illinois last week in a scoring situation really made me take notice. Tough for Iowa to make its usual living off short/mid play action passes if the secondary doesn't have to worry about getting crushed deep. Anyway, that is offtrack and me just arguing my position more.