#1
|
|||
|
|||
weak-tight?
I hear the phrase "weak-tight" bantered about but used liberally, could someone enlighten me on what is usually meant here and how to identify it in other players?
Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weak-tight?
Search for a poster called tufat23.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weak-tight?
tight = not playing enough hands
weak = not being aggressive |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weak-tight?
[ QUOTE ]
Search for a poster called tufat23. [/ QUOTE ] haha i was just thinkin that |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weak-tight?
hi. PM me if you wanna learn the ways of playing weak-tight and 7-tabling whilst running at 7BB/100 at NL100 over the last 25k hands
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weak-tight?
[ QUOTE ]
Search for a poster called tufat23. [/ QUOTE ] thats unfair to weak-tight players. Tufat is clearly wayyy into nit territory |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weak-tight?
in response to OP before this gets into a tufat23 slagfest (yes i added the 23. its important), one thing I consider weaktight is players who take bet/fold lines WAAAY too often. A lot of posters on this forum take this line to 'find out where they are'. well my punk ass just minraises them or reraises 3x on their asses and they just fold.
They take a bet/fold line and so...the bet, get ANY playback and then fold. That's REALLY weak-tight and uber exploitable. and yes I said minraise. Bet/fold lines make minraise bluffing really cheap and have good % hit rates, and is especially successful when you have a weak-tight image, but in fact its the other guy who is weak-tight. He just doesn't know it |
|
|