Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2006, 05:41 AM
MN_Mime MN_Mime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 380
Default AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

UTG+1 is 19 VPIP/ 4 PFR/ 1.6 AF
MP1 is 20 VPIP/ 5 PFR / 1.7 AF

Poker Room skin
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $0.50/$1
10 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (10 players) HERO is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises</font>, UTG+2 folds, MP1 calls <font color="aaaaaa">(3.5:2)</font>, 5 folds, HERO calls <font color="aaaaaa">(5.5:1)</font>.

I put MP1 on a middle pair or something KQish, probably suited given UTG's standards. PF call weak or standard?

Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6.5SB, 3 players)
HERO checks, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 bets</font>, MP1 calls <font color="aaaaaa">(7.5:1)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">HERO raises</font>, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 3-bets</font>, MP1 calls <font color="aaaaaa">(12.5:2)</font>, HERO calls <font color="aaaaaa">(14.5:1)</font>.

MP1's call encouraged me to hand around. I narrowed his range to a flush draw and thus a high card hand I dominated. I tried to represent a monster since I felt confident MP1 wouldn't play back with 2 aggressors.

Turn: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (7.75BB, 3 players)
HERO checks, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 bets</font>, MP1 calls <font color="aaaaaa">(8.75:1)</font>, HERO calls <font color="aaaaaa">(9.75:1)</font>.

River: A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (10.75BB, 3 players)
HERO...?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2006, 05:54 AM
jakbse jakbse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 498
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

I think you go over aggro on the flop, just call here. When you don't improve on the turn it is time to fold. As played I c/c the river if it's still one bet when it comes back to me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2006, 06:06 AM
Ampelmann Ampelmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: lol donkaments
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

Preflop looks good. I wouldn't 3-bet since UTG1's raising standards seem pretty tight (how big is the sample size?). AQ is behind a 4% raising range.

Flop look very much like spewing. Your raise won't fold anyone here since they already put money in. Even a peel is thin I think. You should call the 3-bet, however, for your overs and BDFD.

I have no idea why you call the turn.

River I bet/call.

Edited for a typo.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2006, 07:08 AM
knockonwood knockonwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: avoiding crown
Posts: 1,291
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

I c/c the flop, fold the turn.

Since you stuck around for the river, I call this getting 10.75-1.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2006, 07:11 AM
gostros gostros is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 75
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

As played, I think I would bet-fold the river to a UTG+1 raise. If that ace doesn't slow him down, he has us beat. If MP1 is the raisor, on the other hand, I think we call as he could likely be raising with a lower kicker.

As for the play on the flop...
I would definitely not raise this. Why are you more afraid of MP1 playing back than you are of UTG+1 playing back? The latter seams highly likely, given his stats and previous play on the hand. Also, for those odds, MP1 is probobly not going anywhere given the range of hands you put him on. You aren't setting up a bluff on a later street, so why "try to represent a monster" when you are almost certainly going to showdown on this hand?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2006, 08:12 AM
JerBear77 JerBear77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: trying to scrape up some loose chips
Posts: 1,039
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

Preflop Ok.

Flop is a call, too much FPS here.
Turn we are done when we receive no help.

Your probably against 2 pair or better when the river hits.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2006, 08:18 AM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

Flop is spew. You didn't 3-bet pre-flop so pretending you have a monster on the flop doesn't make much sense, especially since you don't cap and then you check the turn. Turn call is only good if you think your outs are clean and I'm not thinking they are so I'm probably done there. Bet/call the river unless MP1 wakes up and it's 2 back to you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2006, 08:37 AM
Watkins Watkins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Back at work
Posts: 432
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

** grunch **

Ok, this is my first post and it will probably highlight my inexperience but;

For 1 bet I'll call the p/f/r and the MP1 cold call but I want to see a nice flop.

Post-flop although the flop is unlikely to have improved anyone, given the action so far I don't really like where I am, I may raise to see where I stand &amp; possibly to try for a free card but I would be ready to drop on the turn UI. I definately don't like the UTG+1 3-bet here. Also, I'm not sure how much information the raise gives you, UTG+1 may see this as an attempt to buy a free card (given the 2-flush) or as a steal attempt by the BB given the flop co-ordination, that said he seems to like his hand.

On the turn I think I would drop, you've lost the BDFD which leaves you with (best case) 6 outs and discounting a little for possible holdings, AK, AQ, AA, KK, QQ &amp; removing the Qd (this leaves you with 3-4 outs at most) and no odds to call.

As for the river this is one of the cards you were waiting for and possibly one of the cards your opponent(s) were dreading? Given the action so far I don't think UTG+1 is on AK which is my worry, so I would bet out thinking he is unlikely to bet into this scare card? There is also the option to check hoping that UTG+1 bets (putting you both on the flush draw) this may get a call from MP and will allow you to call gaining 2 bets if MP calls and avoiding the loss of 2 bets in the event of AK.

Anyway, I'd be interested to know what you all think am I way off? Am I missing something obvious?

**edit**

Sorry missed the fact that you check-raised the flop so forget all the free-card rubbish. Given that you're first to act I would probably c/c the flop looking to see whether I could hit one of 6 possible outs on the turn.

In your situation, given that your oppoenent is willing to 3-bet into the check-raise I'd put him on a high pair - AA, KK &amp; QQ all reduce your outs significantly, only JJ, TT leave you with 6 outs. So that coupled with MP's possible holdings would see me fold the the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2006, 09:00 AM
jrz1972 jrz1972 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Between Threetown & Cap City
Posts: 3,448
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

Preflop: Fine. I will often 3-bet this, but not against this guy.

Flop: WTF? c/c.

Turn: Fold.

River: Bet. UTG+1 is not going to bet his underpair into two opponents. Neither is MP1.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2006, 09:03 AM
Ampelmann Ampelmann is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: lol donkaments
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: AQo in BB. Call down overcards vs 2 tight-typical?

[ QUOTE ]
Post-flop although the flop is unlikely to have improved anyone, given the action so far I don't really like where I am, I may raise to see where I stand

[/ QUOTE ]
Raising mainly for information is -EV. Mainly b/c the information is unreliable. Here, though, we can be almost 100% sure that we're behind.

[ QUOTE ]
possibly to try for a free card

[/ QUOTE ]
To make free card play profitable, you need a profitable draw in the first place. This is questionable here. In addition, a backdoor draw is not the time for free card play. And, even more importantly, you need position. So, no free card play here.

The only argument one can make to raise the flop is the hope to drive AK and AQ out. This isn't enough for me in this still rather small pot.

[ QUOTE ]
There is also the option to check hoping that UTG+1 bets (putting you both on the flush draw) this may get a call from MP and will allow you to call gaining 2 bets if MP calls and avoiding the loss of 2 bets in the event of AK.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think not betting the river has 2 problems.

(1) No one bets. In this case we usually win but lose value.

(2) UTG1 bets and MP2 raises. We prolly have to fold here, but may be folding the winner sometimes (when MP2 has like AJ).

So I like b/c (with a better read maybe b/f) better than c/c.

[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, I'd be interested to know what you all think am I way off? Am I missing something obvious?

[/ QUOTE ]
Think again about free card play.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.