#1
|
|||
|
|||
Meaningless reply from Christopher S. Bond MO
[ QUOTE ]
Dear Mr. xxxxx: Thank you for taking the time to share your views reagrding H.R.4411, the Internet Gambling Act with me. I am always happy to hear from interested constituents. You will be interested to know that H.R.4411 has passed the House, but has not yet been introduced to the Senate. Before making a decision on this issue, I prefer to review the necessary information and consider the views of Missourians such as yourself. Please rest assured that I will keep your opinion in mind when making a final decision on this matter. Again, thank you for contacting me and please do not hesitate to do so again in the future. Sincerely, Christopher S. Bond United States Senator [/ QUOTE ] Looks standard. Reading in between the lines it looks like he disagress with me but won't tell me so. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meaningless reply from Christopher S. Bond MO
there have been several letters from senators that say they will be voting for the bill, so take this as a positive.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meaningless reply from Christopher S. Bond MO
[ QUOTE ]
there have been several letters from senators that say they will be voting for the bill, so take this as a positive. [/ QUOTE ] Has anyone got anything from a senator saying that they will not be voting for this bill? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meaningless reply from Christopher S. Bond MO
I live in St. Louis. A few weeks ago, I emailed Senator Bond about HR 4411 and received the same reply. He is a religious right senator who probably would vote for this bill.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Meaningless reply from Christopher S. Bond MO
There's a glaring redundancy in the thread title. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
If the Senate bill comes to a vote, you can project both of Missouri's senators to kowtow to the 'family values' crowd. Bond is less beholden to the religious right than Jim Talent, but not by much. |
|
|