An apology is in order Mr GM

[Tuff_Fish]

First off, I apologise to Mr GM for calling him and WSEX liars, that was way overboard.

I got a little carried away with my analysis of the rake structure. It probably isn't as bad as I thought. I missed all the discussion where this had already been dissected to death. I thought I had discovered fire or something.

While I still think the rake should be returned to those who paid it, and not shared, I will keep an open mind regarding WSEX.

Again I apologise for being an a$$. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Tony

*

Edit/MH: Second off, the original post is here.

[McBusto]

Everybody forgives you Tony.

[mjkidd]

[ QUOTE ]
Everybody forgives you Tony.

[/ QUOTE ]

And, fwiw, I think they're working on a system that would try to give back rake paid, not total rake/total players dealt in. It sounds like a non-trivial change to implement, and hopefully their programmers are pretty busy.

[hoosiertim]

Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is.

[mjkidd]

[ QUOTE ]
Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fine for you...funny how tight players LOVE 120 percent rakeback.

[BigPoppa]

[ QUOTE ]
Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

[DING-DONG YO]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Leave the rake structure alone! It is fine the way it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[mayday4379]

Not to open a monster, but I thought a customer srvc rep from WSEX came on right when it became rake free. She said it is based on contribution rake, not being dealt in the hand.

is my memory crap or did they change their structure?

[MicroBob]

Cust-serv rep did say that.

They were wrong.
They didn't change it. It has been dealt-hand all along. But some of their cust-serv reps thought differently and they were mistaken.

[canada_dry]

Takes a man to admit when he's wrong.

Good on you, Tony.

Love the videos by the way...