Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2006, 10:42 PM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: omfg
Posts: 9,677
Default Embarassing hand vs a maniac

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises</font>, Hero calls.

Flop: (4 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, Hero calls.

Turn: (3 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (5 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 6 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2006, 10:59 PM
cassette cassette is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,289
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

It's weak, but I fold preflop.

Unless you flop a set you aren't going to have any idea where you are. Are you going to c/c to the river? If Villain has a low WTSD I might consider c/r the flop and leading the turn, but with the information you have provided I fold preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2006, 11:02 PM
swong4444 swong4444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 470
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

How about 3betting pf?

It really depends on what type of maniac you are dealing with here. If this is the type to slowdown and let you get to showdown for 1.5BB, then I like 3betting pf.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2006, 11:02 PM
Scary_Tiger Scary_Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,590
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
It's weak, but I fold preflop.

Unless you flop a set you aren't going to have any idea where you are. Are you going to c/c to the river? If Villain has a low WTSD I might consider c/r the flop and leading the turn, but with the information you have provided I fold preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

What information? I would just call river.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2006, 11:04 PM
jph0424 jph0424 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 564
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

Fold the flop. Wait for hands that have better showdown value than an underpair on a 4 straight 5 overcard board. I fold flop here because even if you are ahead villain likely has many outs to beat you.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2006, 11:06 PM
jph0424 jph0424 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 564
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

Folding pf would be very weak. Call and evaluate on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2006, 11:07 PM
yellowjack yellowjack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: fighting -EV
Posts: 2,152
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

Quantify his maniac status and tell us how far out of line he has gotten.

Calling &gt; 3-betting &gt; Folding

We're getting 3:1 and have &gt;50% over all non-pair hands. Folding is weak.

I like raising the flop vs. the probable gutshot to bet the turn and checking the river while folding to a donk. If you meet any resistance, fold immediately.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2006, 07:03 AM
cassette cassette is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,289
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
Fold the flop. Wait for hands that have better showdown value than an underpair on a 4 straight 5 overcard board. I fold flop here because even if you are ahead villain likely has many outs to beat you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't every flop going to have 3 overcards? Are you just playing for set value?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-15-2006, 07:10 AM
Dendrite Dendrite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: You looked like a swimmer.
Posts: 620
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

Just because every board will consist of 5 overcards doesn't mean that our equity is roughly the same against his range no matter what falls.

If you're gonna play for set value only you need to fold preflop
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-15-2006, 07:33 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Embarassing hand vs a maniac

We call this preflop because we have the ability to tell the difference between an AKQ flop and a 226 flop. Folding this preflop against a maniac is not good

Advocating for a call preflop for set value is wrong against most opponents. Against a maniac though we just might have the implied odds.

This particular hand I think I dump on the turn. To many cards 7 or better on the board that is in villains range. In these situations I think that if we call the turn we should strongly consider calling the river as well. This river though is as bad as it gets.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.