#1
|
|||
|
|||
66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
I wonder how you guys would play this hand. Villains are both very loose pre and post but not too passive post flop. Typical donks. (God bless them). So:
10/20 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls, SB completes, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, Button calls, SB calls. Flop: (6 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, Button calls, SB calls. Turn: (4.50 BB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, Button calls, SB calls. River: (7.50 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
I'd check the river and probably fold.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
I'd check and wouldn't overcall.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd check and wouldn't overcall. [/ QUOTE ] Misread the order somehow. I think this is a good line, but yes calling is good imo if SB folds. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
I felt that checking the river would cost me, since these guys will easily call with as low as A-hi and maybe worse for example when SB acts after a button fold. I think in general in 3-way pots, not in position, against this sort of players you should bet all the way until someone shows resistance. However I agree that for the specific hand in question, my value bet is marginal.
In the hand they both called. SB had 85o and button had A5o. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
Meh. I don't see how anyone - including you - is supposed to know that at least one of these guys is going to call a river bet with K4o, especially when passive tendencies increase the likelihood of a 7x calling down.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
I like it all over. Hu I would c/c.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
[ QUOTE ]
Meh. I don't see how anyone - including you - is supposed to know that at least one of these guys is going to call a river bet with K4o, especially when passive tendencies increase the likelihood of a 7x calling down. [/ QUOTE ] your post makes no sense. I think this hand is fine, if we were button however I would check this river against 2. True |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
What on earth doesn't make sense? On the river, Hero is either betting for value or betting as a bluff. There's no in-between. Here, he's against two loose-passive opponents who have called down to the river, and he's got third pair. What the [censored] is going to call his river bet? K4o? K5o?
I think that hoping that both opponents are drawing, AND that the river doesn't complete their draw, AND that they'll call a river bet with a busted draw (K-high) is way hopeful. Even more wacky is hoping that button will fold a better hand and the other guy will do whatever. I'm so curious as to what worse hands you guys think will call a river bet. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 hand - Standard or BBV material?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd check and wouldn't overcall. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think the river bet has value. |
|
|