Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2006, 01:20 AM
davebwell davebwell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 441
Default Question about Washington Law

I saw a trip report about a players Day 1 at the WSOP Main Event. He said the WSOP is not allowing clothing with .com logos on it.

Does any of this have top do with ESPN being able to televise the event in Washington state where it is now illegal to advertise online gaming sites.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2006, 10:38 AM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: They r who we thought they were
Posts: 4,406
Default Re: Question about Washington Law

I would think it has to do completely with the fact it is on TV. If someone is walking around a general casino setting with .com apparel on no one would say anything.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2006, 10:45 AM
Overdrive Overdrive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,160
Default Re: Question about Washington Law

Yes, even on all the WSOP tables that Party has sponsered they have Party Poker.net not Party Poker.com. No dot coms allowed. Yet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-30-2006, 11:45 AM
john moon john moon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1
Default Re: Question about Washington Law

I hear advertisements for .COM sites on XM and Sirius Radio all the time. Are they breaking the Washington Law? I do not think that they change their programming or signal just for Washington State.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2006, 12:07 PM
Trouthunter Trouthunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nunyasville
Posts: 230
Default Re: Question about Washington Law

They were doing this before the Washington law. It has to do with federal regulations, not specific state legislation. XM and Sirius are not as regulated by the FCC, which also means they can broadcast Stern and Opie and Anthony with all the cursing.

IIRC there was some serious litigation at the federal level over this. I think one of the sports magazines got in some hot water for advertising a .com site. I'm not at work now, so I can't look it up, but the end result was a huge fine and no more advertising of .coms. Now all the media insists on advertising .net sites.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-30-2006, 01:47 PM
ZPinhead ZPinhead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SeattlePoker.net
Posts: 351
Default Re: Question about Washington Law

If you watch any of the old WPT in Aruba tournys, you'll notice that on the table it says Ultimatebet.com and they have blurred it out in post production. In the most recent one they changed it to .Net It's all about some things that happened with the FCC several years ago and not related to the WA stuff.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.