|
|
#1
07-22-2006, 01:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
I am not just talking about tight players. There are good bit of lags but what I am talking about is postflop play. Very few people are putting money into pot postflop without set or massive draw. Horrible NL games.
Anyone else notice this? The play postflop is VERY NITTY. cheers Boon 
|
|
#2
07-22-2006, 01:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
i don't see how ANY ongame tables are worth it. horrible interface was so obtuse i couldn't take it.
and yes i've noticed the game quality there isn't fabulous. definitely not "unplayable," but i still play elsewhere.
|
|
#3
07-22-2006, 02:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG
$1-2NL is EXTREMELY Weak tight/nitty add on top of that the rake increase beginning at 1/2 and I guess I can see where you are coming from. However when I take a break and play down in limits to clear my head I can still kill it just by playing 16/8. Everyone is soooo weak tight its awesome! Oh and PLEASE stay away from ongame tables [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#4
07-22-2006, 02:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
[ QUOTE ]
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG [/ QUOTE ] The tables are not horrible compared to other sites? Ongame is starting to be like absolute. [ QUOTE ] Oh and PLEASE stay away from ongame tables [/ QUOTE ] I think most ppl do. Only tag/lag bonus chasing whores with an occassional fish stop by. Pokersitescout is showing pokerroom + skins dropping people. Horrible interface and now the NL tables are bad. The correct strat is to bluff more, which I do but it is no where as profitable as it was 6 months/1 yr ago. Horrible. RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT cheers Boon
|
|
#6
07-22-2006, 10:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
I'm playing 50NL at the moment on OnGame ($200 5x bonus with unmentionable on top) - I'm crushing it playing my usual sLAG game. Full of predictable weak-tight players with a few maniacs that you need position on.
|
|
#7
07-22-2006, 11:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
[ QUOTE ]
Is the rake anywhere near as bad for NL as it is for limit? [/ QUOTE ] The rake at NL100 and lower is better than all other sites. At NL200 and above it is the same at all other sites. I agree though there are very tight nitty games. I like it though, and it is very low variance. As fish bust out on other sites, more games will be like this, so get used to it.
|
|
#8
07-22-2006, 11:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ongame FR NL tables > 100 are not worth it
Pokerroom.com's interface is so much smoother than either Party or Stars and far beyond FT. The lobby is more intuitive and game play much easier. 50,100 and 200 NL is full of weak tight/lag maniacs.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
