![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, I screwed this hand up last night when I played it and I'm pretty sure of what I should have done. Here is the situation. I get 88 in UTG+2 and it is folded to me. The table has been tight and a lot of preflop raises have resulted in it being folded around.
If it had been a loose passive table, I would limp in, hope for a lot of callers, and hope to hit a set on the flop. Dump the pair if a lot of overcards come. But in such a tight table, it is a raise or fold situation. With the table tight of it is, I think it is a raise. Correct? Doc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
easy raise.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Raise. You've clearly got the right read on the table.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Easy raise. I think I'm playing 88 from any position even on a tight table. Not every flop is overcards, not every TAG will stick around waiting to hit is overcards.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
easy raise. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In EP, fold 22-55, open-limp 66-77 and raise 88+.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
In EP, fold 22-55, open-limp 66-77 and raise 88+. [/ QUOTE ] Where did you get this from? What limits/table types does it apply to? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
open-limp 66-77 [/ QUOTE ] On a tight table? I'd tend to fold rather than limp these on a real tight table. Doc |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at really tight tables, I start stealing with hands like 98s in utg.
|
![]() |
|
|