Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:09 PM
Sense1ess Sense1ess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 340
Default KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

Villian is 8/3/0 after about 80 hands on 2 tables.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

MP2 ($22.65)
CO ($13.93)
Button ($50.90)
SB Villain ($61)
Hero ($48.75)
UTG ($49.25)
UTG+1 ($9.95)
MP1 ($135.75)

Preflop: Hero is BB with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Villain posts a blind of $0.25.
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Villain (poster) completes, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $2</font>, MP2 folds, Villain calls $2.

Flop: ($5.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Villain checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Villain raises to $9</font>, Hero ???.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:11 PM
Ben Young Ben Young is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Carnegie Mellon
Posts: 938
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

With an opponent this tight, I'd be scared of a set here. But I'd probably end up calling then checking to see what he does. I'm not reccomending this though, because there must be better advice than that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:20 PM
Iconoclastic Iconoclastic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,117
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

If you are behind, and lose a medium sized pot when you fold, and lose your stack when you keep playing. If you are ahead, you lose a medium sized pot when you fold, and win a medium sized pot when you keep playing. That and the fact that his range is about 22,55,TT,JJ,QQ, and most of that range beats you, what you have here is an easy fold.

But hey, at least you get to eat up his SBs each orbit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:22 PM
carnivalhobo carnivalhobo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: one time
Posts: 5,779
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

i think this guy raises TT+ here.


but he almost always has a set here IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:24 PM
los_toros los_toros is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

The preflop action almost virtually removes JJ,QQ,KK,AA but not TT,22,55. If these are the only hands that Villian is playing this way, I fold.

Preflop I'd bump it to $3 instead.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:54 PM
Poker Fool Poker Fool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on your left
Posts: 574
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

80 hands is small, but you got to go with what you know.

I think I fold here, just on the basis villian has shown no aggression post flop at all and now wakes up.

I want him to have JJ / QQ here and this is not impossible, if he only raises 3% of hands his re-raise range must be approaching AA, KK. (this can easily be rubbish given sample size)

He looks like a set miner right now.

I want someone else to find out what aggression from this guy means before I start commiting more chips into this pot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-10-2006, 04:04 PM
otis_nixon otis_nixon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Me & Willie McGee
Posts: 634
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

I think folding is really great here. He's a nit and there's just no reason to pay him off. If you fold a better hand, so be it, the pot's not that big and you'll never win a big pot without a real big hand against this guy.

I hate folding here and I think it takes a little bit of discipline to do it, but I think it's good.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-10-2006, 04:41 PM
Sense1ess Sense1ess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 340
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

Thanks for the replies folks. I ended up folding. I have rarely encountered this situation recently, so I was worried that I may have made a tight fold.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2006, 04:50 PM
crookdimwit crookdimwit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 441
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

Yep, I'd fold this, too...

Against a random opponent, I'd call this, but given your read on the guy, I agree that this sure feels like he's holding TT or maybe 55. Same the gamble for another opponent who is more likely to be making this move with a weaker hand...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2006, 05:10 PM
terp terp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: i fire three shots like a porn star
Posts: 5,522
Default Re: KK against Tight-Passive (NL $50)

i hate these spots but moreover i hate [censored] set mining nits. good fold, make him err by calling preflop with no implied odds.

fwiw, at full ring, i would say the majority of players do not raise much if anything at all out of the blinds, including pairs as big as QQ and AK. a lot of these guys just want to cheaply see a safe flop that gives them an overpair and then go nuts. still, this guy's stats and the c/r on the dry flop suggest a set more often than JJ/QQ here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.