#1
|
|||
|
|||
Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A single hand doesnt determine a better player give me a break [ QUOTE ] Private Joker Reged: 10/16/04 Posts: 6512 [/ QUOTE ] You should definitely know this by now [/ QUOTE ] Have you heard of OOT? wtf does post count mean? [/ QUOTE ] Blow me, dickwad. I have plenty more strategy posts than I do off-topic posts. Gowen can outplay Matusow in a lot more than that one hand. They're both great players, but she's greater. Only misogyny is keeping her from having more respect. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
Nothing to do with the fact that she has 0 achievments in poker then
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A single hand doesnt determine a better player give me a break [ QUOTE ] Private Joker Reged: 10/16/04 Posts: 6512 [/ QUOTE ] You should definitely know this by now [/ QUOTE ] Have you heard of OOT? wtf does post count mean? [/ QUOTE ] Blow me, dickwad. I have plenty more strategy posts than I do off-topic posts. Gowen can outplay Matusow in a lot more than that one hand. They're both great players, but she's greater. Only misogyny is keeping her from having more respect. [/ QUOTE ] Is this a joke or did u just finish getting off to her center fold? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
[ QUOTE ]
Blow me, dickwad. I have plenty more strategy posts than I do off-topic posts. [/ QUOTE ] You're so defensive it's hilarious. Also, BBV doesnt count as strategy. Anyways, i'm just saying there's no argument against you in relation to any stats like that, since this place is more than just strategy forums. You can tell that by looking at guys who play .50/1 and have 4k posts around here. But again, lol at your incisive auto-flame reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
[ QUOTE ]
I'm glad you could hunt down a day i had at 2/4, joke. [/ QUOTE ] And you're insulting me for being defensive? Pot, meet kettle. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm glad you could hunt down a day i had at 2/4, joke. [/ QUOTE ] And you're insulting me for being defensive? Pot, meet kettle. [/ QUOTE ] Defending that would be posting the graph where i win over x amount of hands. I'm just saying it's interesting you felt the need to find a post like that. Even more defensive, if you will. You're not a loser, you're pretty. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just saying it's interesting you felt the need to find a post like that. Even more defensive, if you will. You're not a loser, you're pretty. [/ QUOTE ] It's interesting you even got involved in this discussion. Why? Another poster wondered why I didn't know that it takes more than one hand to prove poker skill. You butt in for some unknown reason to say that because of OOT, a poster can have a high post count and still not know anything about poker. What was the point of that? And thanks for calling me pretty. I do take care of myself. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clonie Gowan owns Mike Matusow
Originally, to encourage the fact that you arent obligated to "know" anything by now.
That was my point. |
|
|