#1
|
|||
|
|||
What am I doing wrong?? algerbra, percent,s and roots.. oh my.
aggghhhh... Why doesnt this work??
First a bit of explanation, because maybe an asumption is wrong. Im going to try not to use poker specific language because it just complicates things. If your chance of winning a bet against one player is 50% your odds against multiple players are (roughly) .5 ^ n where n is the number of opponents. so... I thought I could reverse the process and if I was given the chance of winning and the number of opponents I could figure out the equivelent for the different number of opponents. for example .5 with one opponent is roughly equal to .25 with two opponents. Im sure I probably messed something up by now ... but I'll continue ... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] so to reverse it I dragged a bit of algerbra out of the recesses of my brain and figured I could take the Nth root (N= # Opponents) of the chance of winning against multiple opponents, and have a rough estimate of the chance you would have against one opponent. so if I had a .40 chance or winning againts 5 opponents it would be the same as .40 ^ (1/4) since getting the nth root of a number is the same as raising it to the power of 1/n. but .... obviously Im wrong, or I wouldnt be posting asking for help again [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] but where? (is there a plural to the word where?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What am I doing wrong?? algerbra, percent,s and roots.. oh my.
I think you have the right idea. The only mistake I see is that if you're .4 to win against 5 opponents, you would want the fifth root, not the fourth to find the odds of beating a single opponent, i.e. .4^(1/5), not .4^(1/4). Of course this assumes your chance of beating each opponent is not dependent on you beating or losing to other opponents.
|
|
|