#1
|
|||
|
|||
A hand from Canterbury 30/60
I was not involved in this hand but it's pretty amazing.
Bad player limps. SB completes. BB (Scratch) checks. Flop AKT with the ace of spades. Checked to the limper who bets, SB folds, Scratch calls. Turn Ks. Check, limper bets, Scratch raises, limper 3 bets, Scratch 4 bets, limper calls. River Ts. Scratch bets, limper calls. The hands? Scratch: QsJs for royal flush. Limper: AK for biiig boat. I couldn't make this up if I tried. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
That is some really weird action. From a FTOP point of view limper played it awesomely except preflop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
[ QUOTE ]
That is some really weird action. From a FTOP point of view limper played it awesomely except preflop. [/ QUOTE ] and turn? he had the nutssess and didnt 5 bet |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] That is some really weird action. From a FTOP point of view limper played it awesomely except preflop. [/ QUOTE ] and turn? he had the nutssess and didnt 5 bet [/ QUOTE ] he put scratch on AA. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
O RLY?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] That is some really weird action. From a FTOP point of view limper played it awesomely except preflop. [/ QUOTE ] and turn? he had the nutssess and didnt 5 bet [/ QUOTE ] he put scratch on AA. [/ QUOTE ] so he missed bets and read the villain's hand wrong. wow. edit: i guess he didn't have the nutsesses |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
I can't even begin to wrap my mind around this one - every street is a WTF?!??!
D |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
just calling river is a WTF
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
W . T . F ?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand from Canterbury 30/60
i dont know why, but i cant see any street that perplexes me. river maybe a little but. then again i play .5/1 limit where im used to this play.
|
|
|