Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2005, 05:36 PM
Paul77 Paul77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 100
Default Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

Was playing stud hi today, and had KK8 (pocket kings) vs. an ace. The ace raised; there was another ace out. I re-raised, and it got heads-up. The ace caught a blank, and bet into me, my kings did not improve. I folded. Was this too tight on my part? I can post the hand if it would help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2005, 05:46 PM
benwood benwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,432
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

This is a common & opponent read related subject that can't be answered in a pat manner.You did take a conservative view on the hand,but my guess is that you were correct.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2005, 08:47 PM
beta1607 beta1607 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,509
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

We need more information such as the stakes and a read on your opponent but generally speaking a fold wouldn't be terrible here.

Also it is worth noting that according to the Stud 8 Chapter in SSII two aces being up increases the odds that one of the players has a pair of aces by a decent margin.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2005, 02:42 AM
Paul77 Paul77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 100
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

>>Also it is worth noting that according to the Stud 8 Chapter in SSII two aces being up increases the odds that one of the players has a pair of aces by a decent margin.

Yep, I read that too, but that was referring to stud 8 and I was playing stud hi at the time, but it may very well be aplicable to stud hi as well, maybe even more so.

The stakes were low, a 1/2 game on Stars.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2005, 02:47 PM
frappeboy frappeboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Running like lstream
Posts: 584
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

You were incorrect to fold 4th street here. Once you re-raise third, you must go to the river ESPECIALLY with his dead ace. There is no inbetween with this hand. Either you re-raise and go to the river or just fold.

The only time you should be folding this hand after you re-raise is when your opponent makes an open pair and you are pretty sure he has aces.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2005, 03:46 PM
greenage greenage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,303
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

I’d like to see the hand posted.

If you’re going to fold on fourth then why raise in the first place?

Since it’s heads-up, I might just call down even though I’ll never know if he pairs his side card.

Unless I didn’t add right, the pot should be offering you about 6:1 on your call and you’re about a 2:1 dog when he has the Aces.

Do you guys see any benefit to a raise on fourth?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2005, 05:02 PM
benwood benwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,432
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

When I first read your post I was thinking that you had split K's instead of K's in the hole .With burried K's,he is more likely to bet into you with something like Q's or J's in the hole.So,when when your K's are in the hole,I think the fold is incorrect.

I would be interested to know what other posters think is the right play if you have split K's.It may be right to call here,too.I'm not sure.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2005, 07:05 PM
Alex/Mugaaz Alex/Mugaaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: There is only The Question
Posts: 1,857
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

You're not so far behind that you can't peel 1 to catch a king or 2pair. You're getting like 6 to 1 or so now? If I atch nothing that improves me I suually fold fifth.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-01-2006, 01:49 AM
frappeboy frappeboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Running like lstream
Posts: 584
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

[ QUOTE ]
You're getting like 6 to 1 or so now?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is not the correct way to think about this hand, you need to think about first your odds of winning, and then how much it will cost you to see the hand through. In this situation 4 small bets went in on 3rd street, and usually there is 1 small bet in antes/forced bet (it could be 2 small bets depending on ante structure, but I'm assuming this structure was tight). So right now there is approximately 2.5 big bets in the pot. It costs you 2.5 bets to see the river card assuming your opponent bets into you the whole way, so you are getting 5BB-2.5BB, or 2-1 to call this down. Your hand is about a 2-1 underdog if he SHOWS you his aces. So you are getting correct pot odds to see the river.

Now you are actually doing much better than what the odds suggest, and here is why. First of all he may not even have aces in which case you are actually a favorite. Secondly, if your opponent is a weak player, you're gonna outplay him on later streets. For instance he might still keep on coming when you pair your door card, or if hes weak he might check aces/aces up on the river. All these things add to your positive expectation.

The problem with thinking about the pot odds right now compared to your chances of winning is you'll ALWAYS get the right pot odds. For instance, lets just say there was only 3 small bets in the pot, or 1.5 BB. Now when he bets on 4th you are getting 4-1 to call. Now on 5th street there is 2.5 BB so you'll be getting 3.5-1, and so on. But if you calculated how much it costs you for the whole hand, you would be risking 2.5BB to win 4BB, or 1.6-1. Since your hand is a 2-1 underdog it now becomes correct to fold.

For more information on this concept check out the "Theory of Poker", chapter effective odds.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-01-2006, 02:27 AM
Paul77 Paul77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 100
Default Re: Big pair vs. potential bigger pair, stud hi: too tight?

Yeah, it was too tight in hindsight. My thinking was he had the aces, and I didn't want to chase from behind, but I should have at least seen fifth.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.