#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
I'm wondering because I want to play more then 10 tables on party and everytime I email support to ask if I can have that many they never give me a good reason why not. I'd think they would want more rake? Is there something going on that I don't know about.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
I'll see if I can pull some strings and get PartyPoker to let you play on 12 tables, BUT YOU OWE ME ONE!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
they let me play 12 as of yesterday but if you could push for 14 i'd give you a shiny dollar.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
[ QUOTE ]
they let me play 12 as of yesterday but if you could push for 14 i'd give you a shiny dollar. [/ QUOTE ] Really? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
They would limit the number of tables because of bandwidth or software performance limitations.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
[ QUOTE ]
They would limit the number of tables because of bandwidth or software performance limitations. [/ QUOTE ] that makes sense, thanks. [ QUOTE ] Really? [/ QUOTE ] no |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
it's to limit datamining and bots.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is there a reason for sites limiting the # of tables?
also it's really annoying when a multi-tabler can't act fast enough and consistently uses up the timer every hand just to fold and crap like that. slows the games down greatly.
|
|
|