|
|
#1
05-30-2006, 11:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Is this really possible?
12,254 hands at 1/2 at 2.30bb/100 (I have been winning at 1/2 much longer than this, these are just all the hands I have recorded).
9,406 hands at 2/4 at -2.01bb/100 The sessions at 2/4 really just feel like I'm not getting the cards I need to win. I look back through my hands and I can find a bet I missed here or a fold I didn't make, but it really doesn't seem like I'm making huge mistakes. And its only 200bb, which isn't too bad. But what is bothering me how long its lasting. Its just like such a steady lose with almost no winning streaks at all. So what do you think? Good possibility I'm a loser at 2/4? I'm like 18/10/2.7 FWIW. 
|
|
#2
05-30-2006, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this really possible?
Anything is possible if you pray really hard
|
|
#4
05-30-2006, 11:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this really possible?
that is exactly what happened to me after moving up from .5/1 to 1/2. I have about 30k hands at .5/1 ... I moved back down said screw this then headed to NL and have not looked back [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
You're just running bad though , you'll be alright ...just a brutal stretch and small mistakes only add up after time
|
|
#5
05-30-2006, 11:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this really possible?
To be losing 2BB/100 over such a huge sample size suggests to me you are a loser at 2/4. Did you manage to get that all onto 1 database on pokertracker or did you have to combine a couple?
|
|
#7
05-30-2006, 12:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this really possible?
[ QUOTE ]
all 1 database. really though, 4bb/100 of mistakes that didnt matter at 1/2? [/ QUOTE ] It's actually a lot more than that, PT uses a logarithmic scale to determine BB/100.
|
|
#9
05-30-2006, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is this really possible?
[ QUOTE ]
Do I suck? Here are plenty of arbitrary numbers that clearly I derive statistical significance from, as should you. [/ QUOTE ] What's good for ailing variance?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
