Im king of the world

[iceman5]

Im king of the world!!!!!!!!

J/K...good run though.

[carnivalhobo]

graph in dollars

[iceman5]

Why?

[cheer]

why not?

[Bubbles]

iceman, you run Bet the Pot, right? I used to hang out there a lot back when I was playing NL. Unfortunately the limit forum is horrendous, so I haven't been around much lately. Still a nice forum overall, so kudos to you.

[iceman5]

[ QUOTE ]
iceman, you run Bet the Pot, right? I used to hang out there a lot back when I was playing NL. Unfortunately the limit forum is horrendous, so I haven't been around much lately. Still a nice forum overall, so kudos to you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes I do and thanks for the kind words. As far as the money graph...use your imagination. I dont see what difference it makes how much money Ive made. The point of the graph was to dispell the myth that you cant win with low variance.

Alot of 2+2ers think you have to raise preflop 15% or more to win. Alot think only LAGs win at a nice rate. Ive been saying this is wrong for 2 years now so I thought I would throw up a graph to show TAG play (even slightly weak tight play) can produce more than solid returns.

A good LAG can win alot of money but so can a good TAG.

[HedonismBot]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
iceman, you run Bet the Pot, right? I used to hang out there a lot back when I was playing NL. Unfortunately the limit forum is horrendous, so I haven't been around much lately. Still a nice forum overall, so kudos to you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes I do and thanks for the kind words. As far as the money graph...use your imagination. I dont see what difference it makes how much money Ive made. The point of the graph was to dispell the myth that you cant win with low variance.

Alot of 2+2ers think you have to raise preflop 15% or more to win. Alot think only LAGs win at a nice rate. Ive been saying this is wrong for 2 years now so I thought I would throw up a graph to show TAG play (even slightly weak tight play) can produce more than solid returns.

A good LAG can win alot of money but so can a good TAG.

[/ QUOTE ]

While this may or may not be true, your sample size is waaaaaaay too small to tell.

[iceman5]

True, thats why I said "good run". However I have well over a million hands played with probably 250000 at $200NL and higher and the results arent this good, they are still very nice.

This is just my latest database which I started not too long after switching to 6 max (where my variance is even lower than it was at full ring, believe it or not)

[bugstud]

bbv standard = cash money graphs, bastard

[Sykes]

Just a guess on $$, I would say rough estimate is $12.5K (+/- 2K)