MT ratio for high stakes players

Mig · #1 05-28-2006, 09:33 AM

I have been lurking the NL high stakes forum lately and I noticed that most decent players were 8-10 tabling the NL 2k.

Is anyone playing limit high stakes able to 8 table the 100/200 games + and still have a good win rate there ? I know for a fact that 8 tabling 30/60 is doable, but each time I got more than 4 tables of 100/200 my results dropped considerably.

Bluffman · #2 05-28-2006, 10:49 AM

are there even 8 100-200 tables going at once? (assuming you'd only play fulltables because a couple of 3 or 4 handed games in the mix would probably require too much attention)

Mig · #3 05-28-2006, 11:07 AM

The NL multi tablers are often playing 8-10 tables of 6max, aren't they ?

Derek123 · #4 05-28-2006, 11:21 AM

I also can only play 4 tables. I think its just the quantity of actions in each limit hand is so much more than in NL. Even if a lot of the decisions are routine it seems like so much more is going on playing a lot of tables of limit. IN NL each decision is more important but you dont have to make as many decisions per hand. Also Im not real sure on this but dont vpip tend to be less in NL?

James282 · #5 05-28-2006, 12:27 PM

Mig,

100 200 plays a lot bigger than 10 20 NL. 10 20 NL is probably closer to 50 100 than 100 200.
-James

flawless_victory · #6 05-28-2006, 01:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The NL multi tablers are often playing 8-10 tables of 6max, aren't they ?

[/ QUOTE ]this is easier to do playing NL. LHE is v fast and can be difficult to play alot of tbls SH'ed (at least for me).

flawless_victory · #7 05-28-2006, 01:59 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Mig,

100 200 plays a lot bigger than 10 20 NL. 10 20 NL is probably closer to 50 100 than 100 200.
-James

[/ QUOTE ]
uhhhh, relevance?

Digs · #8 05-28-2006, 03:31 PM

kind of relevant imo

if party offered higher nl stakes the 'norm' probably wouldnt be 8 tabling

Mig · #9 05-28-2006, 03:54 PM

yah it's the same for me. Sometimes there is 7-8 tables of 100/200 and I just can't 8 tables them. The max I could do with ok results is 4 tables... But I definitvely could 8 table the 30/60...

Bluffman · #10 05-29-2006, 08:39 AM

Mig,

just saw your may stats. very impressive. I had no idea PP 1-2 players were pulling in that much. I always thought I was being smart for playing the 30 and avoiding the apeshit variance that 1-2 sometimes brings. Was wondering what your lifetime stats are for PP 1-2, and if the games really are as good as your stats suggest, or if you're just much better at LHE than I am. Convince me to join PP 1-2 so you can bust me and get even richer.
Cheers