|
|
#1
05-23-2006, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
sb attempt, line check
river play retarded or standard? Up against 27/14 tagish..
. Hand converted by Check Raised hand converter Preflop (6 players): Hero is SB with   4 folds. <u>HERO 2 bets.</u> BB 3 bets. <u>HERO calls.</u> Flop (6 small bets, 2 players):    <u>HERO checks.</u> BB bets. <u>HERO 2 bets.</u> BB calls. Turn (5 bets, 2 players):  <u>HERO bets.</u> BB calls. River (7 bets , 2 players):  hero checks(induce bluff and or save a bet LOL),op bets,hero call 
|
|
#2
05-23-2006, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sb attempt, line check
If you told me you were trying to check/raise the river I'd like it a lot more. TAGs are the sort of player that can't resist a river value bet with any queen, K9, pocket pairs under kings, and maybe A7. He'd probably have let you know on the turn if he had a good king to charge you instead of offering a marginally free card by calling.
Ace high will sometimes get shown down, any pair six or higher is seeing showdown, etc, so I don't think there's a lot of value in inducing a bluff. Villain will check behind his marginal hands and a TAG doesn't have very many hands to bluff with once he calls the turn bet. But he has a lot of hands to pay you off when you fire again.
|
|
#3
05-23-2006, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sb attempt, line check
note taken!!!
|
|
#4
05-23-2006, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sb attempt, line check
Love preflop and flop.
I think him not raising the turn tells you an awful lot. The only hand that a) 3-bets PF, b) beats you on the river, and c) was trailing you on the turn is QQ. I agree... I think the value gained in inducing a bluff is lost by the immediate value realized by bet/call'ing the river.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
