Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2006, 12:55 AM
MinRaise MinRaise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spending >10k qualifying for ME
Posts: 640
Default Closers in non-save situations

While I was sitting here trying to type a paper/browse 2+2, I heard the unmistakable southern drawl of Jeff Brantley ranting in the background. He was going off on Willie Randolph for bringing in Billy Wagner to protect a four-run ninth inning lead vs. the Yankees today. He said something to the effect of "Duaner Sanchez should have remained in the game with Billy Wagner warming up in case someone got on first base so it was a save situation." They also said it was the third time Wagner had blown a 4+ run lead in his career.

Dumb things are said on ESPN every day, but this had to be one of the dumbest. Jeff Brantley's argument was that Wagner would have been more motivated to shut down the Yankees if Duaner Sanchez allowed a baserunner rather than himself thus allowing himself a save opportunity.

Is there any way to search for stats to find if this has any relevancy? For example, examining how closers protect four run vs. three run leads in the ninth. Jeff Brantley is clearly a numbskull, but he was a good closer at some point in his career, so I would be interested to know if there is any relevancy to what he said.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2006, 12:57 AM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: Closers in non-save situations

He's being extremely results-oriented, that is all.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2006, 01:05 AM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 5,114
Default Re: Closers in non-save situations

I do think it was dumb to bring in Wagner. Sanchez had an easy 8th, I see no reason to not let him try to finish out the game. I hate taking out a pitcher in a spot like that for no reason.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2006, 01:07 AM
junglewarfare junglewarfare is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,626
Default Re: Closers in non-save situations

Using whether the game is a "save situation" or not is obviously a retarded way of choosing when to use your closer.

If I were a Mets fan I'd be really pissed at Randolph for not taking Wagner out after he walked Stinnett on 4 pitches. he threw 4 straight balls... to kelly stinnett...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2006, 01:08 AM
Dudd Dudd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,048
Default Re: Closers in non-save situations

It's actually a bad move, but not because he'll pitch better in a save situation than in a non-save situation. Instead, while he might have blown a 4 run lead, something like 98% of the time the Mets would win with Billy Wagner, and maybe 97.5% of the time they'll win with an average reliever. So, there isn't much of an advantage to going to your closer. However, lets say tomorrow it's a 1 run game in the eight. Obviously, he can't pitch both the 8th and 9th because he pitched the day before. However, if he's rested, he probably would be able to pitch both innings, and instead of there existing a .5% difference between the winning percentage with your closer or an average reliever, the gap is much more significant, and you can much better leverage your closer by getting two innings of important work rather than one meaningless inning and one important inning.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.