Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2006, 02:58 AM
flatline flatline is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 984
Default Question (Low in the hole)

OK, at my regular game tonight, we played a round of low in the hole roll your own. For those who don't know the game, it is seven-card stud, except that you get each of your cards down and choose which one to put face up (except for the last one, which stays down, of course). Also, the lowest of your hole cards is wild. Aces can be high or low.

So, at showdown, one player shows four jacks, and the other player shows (Tc Th Ac) 3c 5c 8d Qh.

We were unsure whether the hand should be ruled an A-5 straight flush or ruled just an Ace high flush, as the Ace had been called high and could not also be low to make the straight flush.

I don't think there is an official rule in a wild card game like this, but what do you think is more reasonable?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2006, 06:26 AM
jhfranklin jhfranklin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

My understanding is that the ace is called high just so you know which card is wild, not to limit how it can be used.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2006, 07:33 AM
crackhead crackhead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 851
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

My regular home game has always played it as "aces in the hole are ALWAYS HIGH...". So, in your example, the 2 T's would be wild.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2006, 09:33 AM
blank frank blank frank is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 99
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

I've always played ace is always high in the hole for this sort of game also. However, in that sort of game, that would be considered an A-5 straight flush. So I don't see that calling the ace high in order to make the tens wild would change anything.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2006, 06:45 PM
Snarf Snarf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Men should act like Men
Posts: 4,488
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

I apparantly misunderstood your rules 'cuz I don't see any sort of a flush in that guys hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-14-2006, 06:50 PM
2+2 wannabe 2+2 wannabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GOD BLESS AMERICA
Posts: 6,049
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

how the hell is straight flush winning 2:1

you don't get 2 wild cards cause they're the same rank
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-14-2006, 07:34 PM
flatline flatline is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 984
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

[ QUOTE ]
I apparantly misunderstood your rules 'cuz I don't see any sort of a flush in that guys hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ac 3c 5c, plus the two tens, which are wild.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-14-2006, 07:38 PM
flatline flatline is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 984
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

[ QUOTE ]
how the hell is straight flush winning 2:1

you don't get 2 wild cards cause they're the same rank

[/ QUOTE ]

I've never seen a wild card game like this ever played where having a low pair does not mean you have two wilds. I'm pretty sure it is played this way is the vast majority of "low in the hole" type games.

Regardless, the statement that "you don't get 2 wild cards cause they're the same rank" is wrong. We are talking about home games, and whatever the home game rule is obviously goes.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-14-2006, 08:21 PM
Banks2334 Banks2334 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lost in the Supermarket
Posts: 2,116
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

Just another reason not to play games like this.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-14-2006, 08:53 PM
bigballz bigballz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: final table sucking
Posts: 4,557
Default Re: Question (Low in the hole)

wilds are dumb
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.