(OT) Anyone know RaiNKhaN on stars? he 15-20 tables the $15+1 Turbos

[pokerlaw]

played a few with this guy yesterday. since he is roughly 18-20 tabling the turbos I feel like he might be a 2+2er. In one SNG I played in, he busted out 9th when TT cracked his AA and someone commented he was a bot. Now I am not saying that, but was wondering what people thought of his play...

[yid3655]

If you are playing 18-20 tables your early play will be very robotic, also the fact he plays so many tables probably means its near enough impossible for him to chat this proving he isnt a bot.

[therock]

Not sure who he is. Lately he has been running 25 tables at a time. He plays solid ABC poker. I think he is a bit passive on the bubble. Guess I would be too if I had 16-18 bubbles at the same time.

[anacrime]

I know him from Starcraft. His name on battle.net was z7-RaiN. Probably a solid player.

[async]

Do people think it's reasonable to think he is a bot? I'm just returning to 2+2 and poker in general after a long absence, and in the meantime I've read about $200 bots that sit and play nonstop, and right as I returned to 2+2 I caught that thread where someone was mentioning they'd been banned after making $15k playing $20+2s without ever moving up. (And it sounded like despite protestations they may have been using a bot, as they didn't even answer popups)

Anyhow, I'm just wondering if people report 15-tablers, and if they still trust the system in general.

[pokerlaw]

[ QUOTE ]
Not sure who he is. Lately he has been running 25 tables at a time. He plays solid ABC poker. I think he is a bit passive on the bubble. Guess I would be too if I had 16-18 bubbles at the same time.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah his style seems to be "ABC" as you put it. He was a little too "pushy" in one of the SNGs I played w him yesterday:

PokerStars Game #3432841578: Tournament #17027932, Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (200/400) - 2005/12/25 - 16:05:35 (ET)
Table '17027932 1' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: metfan630 (5102 in chips)
Seat 4: el_loco129 (1835 in chips)
Seat 5: parimic (2485 in chips)
Seat 7: RaiNKhAN (2175 in chips)
Seat 9: matthewreed (1903 in chips)
metfan630: posts the ante 25
el_loco129: posts the ante 25
parimic: posts the ante 25
RaiNKhAN: posts the ante 25
matthewreed: posts the ante 25
el_loco129: posts small blind 200
parimic: posts big blind 400
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to metfan630 [3d 4h]
RaiNKhAN: raises 1750 to 2150 and is all-in
matthewreed: calls 1878 and is all-in
metfan630: folds
el_loco129: folds
parimic: folds
*** FLOP *** [7h 2c 4c]
*** TURN *** [7h 2c 4c] [Jh]
*** RIVER *** [7h 2c 4c Jh] [Ad]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
RaiNKhAN: shows [3h Ah] (a pair of Aces)
matthewreed: shows [Ac 8h] (a pair of Aces - Eight kicker)
matthewreed collected 4481 from pot

[ZBTHorton]

[ QUOTE ]
Do people think it's reasonable to think he is a bot? I'm just returning to 2+2 and poker in general after a long absence, and in the meantime I've read about $200 bots that sit and play nonstop, and right as I returned to 2+2 I caught that thread where someone was mentioning they'd been banned after making $15k playing $20+2s without ever moving up. (And it sounded like despite protestations they may have been using a bot, as they didn't even answer popups)

Anyhow, I'm just wondering if people report 15-tablers, and if they still trust the system in general.

[/ QUOTE ]

A substantial amount of 2p2'ers 10-12 table. Just because you play alot of tables, doesn't make you a bot.

[citanul]

if you think there's something wrong with this play, you're dumb.

c

[anacrime]

I'm almost certain it's not a bot. He used to post on another forum.

[pokerlaw]

[ QUOTE ]
if you think there's something wrong with this play, you're dumb.

c

[/ QUOTE ]

he had pushed a lot of hands in the last few orbits, i thought it was a little loose, no?