Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-13-2006, 03:28 AM
Il_Mostro Il_Mostro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,072
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

"Contrary to the laws of nature."

Ok, what laws are we talking about here? The only laws of nature I can think of are the natural laws, eg. gravity and the laws of thermodynamics. How are same-sex marriage breaking those?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-13-2006, 03:36 AM
Autocratic Autocratic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,004
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

[ QUOTE ]
Peter's point is logically coherent. If you aren't going to define marriage as only between a man and a woman, then there's not much reason to insist on monogamy either.

[/ QUOTE ]

What, besides social precedents, makes the distinction between gender preference and monogamy/polygamy equal?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-13-2006, 04:44 AM
Cyrus Cyrus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Banned
Posts: 7,248
Default Crazy sex and it\'s not even close

[ QUOTE ]
I have come to the conclusion that liberals just don't like reproductive sex.

[/ QUOTE ] If you mean liberals don't like sex meant strictly for reproduction, we agree !

But if you mean liberals don't like heterosexual sex, well...

If we broadly define "liberals" and "conservatives" in terms of social and sexual values, I will categorically claim (and will back it with money!) that liberals are sexually more active and experimental than conservatives.

Any one wants to make a federal case out of my claim ? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-13-2006, 06:43 AM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Your own, personal, Antichrist
Posts: 3,323
Default Re: Crazy sex and it\'s not even close


If we broadly define "liberals" and "conservatives" in terms of social and sexual values, I will categorically claim (and will back it with money!) that liberals masturbate more than conservatives due to their inability to keep a wife or husband.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-13-2006, 06:51 AM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Your own, personal, Antichrist
Posts: 3,323
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

A law of nature being something that conforms to its end.

Poo poo holes are made for poo poo, not for wee wees. And we shouldn't swallow our babies either.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:50 AM
tomdemaine tomdemaine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: buying up the roads around your house
Posts: 4,835
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

[ QUOTE ]
A law of nature being something that conforms to its end.

Poo poo holes are made for poo poo, not for wee wees. And we shouldn't swallow our babies either.

[/ QUOTE ]

And the hand wasn't naturally designed to stimulate the penis, and the mouth is naturally for food. So you're telling me you've never jerked off or gotten a blow job?? No wonder you're so uptight.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:57 AM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Your own, personal, Antichrist
Posts: 3,323
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

You can use your hands or another person's mouth for that, but the end result must land somewhere within a vagina for it to be a complete natural action.

And no, I definitely don't need to masturbate.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:58 AM
Cyrus Cyrus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Banned
Posts: 7,248
Default Sex liberally

[ QUOTE ]
liberals masturbate more than conservatives due to their inability to keep a wife or husband.

[/ QUOTE ]

In yer heart, you know the truth.

Y'jus' gotta live with it.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:01 AM
Il_Mostro Il_Mostro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,072
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

"but the end result must land somewhere within a vagina for it to be a complete natural action."
I still don't get it. Why is it only a natural action if the end result land somewhere within a vagina?

There are animals that masturbate and are involved in homosexual acts. Are they also unnatural?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:03 AM
Il_Mostro Il_Mostro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,072
Default Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy

"A law of nature being something that conforms to its end."
And how does marriage fit into that? Marriage is a human construct.

And why shouldn't we swallow our babies under this definition? I mean, in that case we are using the mouth for what it's meant for, eating.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.