#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
"Contrary to the laws of nature."
Ok, what laws are we talking about here? The only laws of nature I can think of are the natural laws, eg. gravity and the laws of thermodynamics. How are same-sex marriage breaking those? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
[ QUOTE ]
Peter's point is logically coherent. If you aren't going to define marriage as only between a man and a woman, then there's not much reason to insist on monogamy either. [/ QUOTE ] What, besides social precedents, makes the distinction between gender preference and monogamy/polygamy equal? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Crazy sex and it\'s not even close
[ QUOTE ]
I have come to the conclusion that liberals just don't like reproductive sex. [/ QUOTE ] If you mean liberals don't like sex meant strictly for reproduction, we agree ! But if you mean liberals don't like heterosexual sex, well... If we broadly define "liberals" and "conservatives" in terms of social and sexual values, I will categorically claim (and will back it with money!) that liberals are sexually more active and experimental than conservatives. Any one wants to make a federal case out of my claim ? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Crazy sex and it\'s not even close
If we broadly define "liberals" and "conservatives" in terms of social and sexual values, I will categorically claim (and will back it with money!) that liberals masturbate more than conservatives due to their inability to keep a wife or husband. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
A law of nature being something that conforms to its end.
Poo poo holes are made for poo poo, not for wee wees. And we shouldn't swallow our babies either. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
[ QUOTE ]
A law of nature being something that conforms to its end. Poo poo holes are made for poo poo, not for wee wees. And we shouldn't swallow our babies either. [/ QUOTE ] And the hand wasn't naturally designed to stimulate the penis, and the mouth is naturally for food. So you're telling me you've never jerked off or gotten a blow job?? No wonder you're so uptight. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
You can use your hands or another person's mouth for that, but the end result must land somewhere within a vagina for it to be a complete natural action.
And no, I definitely don't need to masturbate. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Sex liberally
[ QUOTE ]
liberals masturbate more than conservatives due to their inability to keep a wife or husband. [/ QUOTE ] In yer heart, you know the truth. Y'jus' gotta live with it. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
"but the end result must land somewhere within a vagina for it to be a complete natural action."
I still don't get it. Why is it only a natural action if the end result land somewhere within a vagina? There are animals that masturbate and are involved in homosexual acts. Are they also unnatural? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Canadian Liberal Hypocrites deny Polygamy
"A law of nature being something that conforms to its end."
And how does marriage fit into that? Marriage is a human construct. And why shouldn't we swallow our babies under this definition? I mean, in that case we are using the mouth for what it's meant for, eating. |
|
|