|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are. [/ QUOTE ] Harris - 0.680 Coaches - 0.689 Computer - 0.730 it's those damned catholic computers! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are. [/ QUOTE ] Harris - 0.680 Coaches - 0.689 Computer - 0.730 it's those damned catholic computers! [/ QUOTE ] MARGIN OF VICTORY. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
16 Rutgers 6-0 24 416 .000 19 415 .268 .000 0 .395 [/ QUOTE ] Yes sir, look at them Scarlet Knights. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are. [/ QUOTE ] Notre dame would beat cal by 2 touchdowns on a neutral field, IMO |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
ROFLMAO. Please. ND? I bet they'd beat OSU by 5 TDs at home to. Go back, watch the ND-Mich tapes and see how good ND really is. Go watch the MSU game, they aren't that good.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
ROFLMAO. Please. ND? I bet they'd beat OSU by 5 TDs at home to. Go back, watch the ND-Mich tapes and see how good ND really is. Go watch the MSU game, they aren't that good. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think they're great, but they're not that bad either. It's just hard to gauge given they play some great teams, some very bad ones, and a few on the cusp of the top 25. I wish there were some 11-25 matchups so it'd be easier to place them (and increase the P of them losing more, of course). Although I will concede that the GTech win is looking better and better all the time. And contrary to my earlier assertions, PSU is not bad. They're still not very good, but whatever, a blowout win is pretty good against them. So they're maybe a 10-12 team, which I guess is actually pretty good. Stupid retractions. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
ROFLMAO. Please. ND? I bet they'd beat OSU by 5 TDs at home to. Go back, watch the ND-Mich tapes and see how good ND really is. Go watch the MSU game, they aren't that good. [/ QUOTE ] ND is a good football team...and apparently you didnt see cal play tennessee (they looked worse than ND did against michigan)....in case everyone has forgotten, the Pac-10 really isnt very good, I'd make the line ND -9.5 on a neutral field EDIT: Maybe I'm crazy...but cal doesn't impress me AT ALL, and ND is very well-coached |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
Michigan was like 13-15 in preseason polls. I'd say that they have moved up well. I dont really care if we are 2 or 3. Doesnt make a difference as long as we beat OSU next month.
Except for ND probably being too high, I dont have too much problem with the rest of the rankings (though maybe Cal could be higher). The winner of WVa/Louisville will improve when they play each other (as well as Rutgers). SC's ranking will sort itself out when they play Cal and ND. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
Complete List, sorry it doesnt seem to fit well.
BCS Standings Rk Team W-L Harris Coaches CPU % BCS Rk Points % Rk Points % Prev Avg 1 Ohio State 7-0 1 2848 .000 1 1575 1.016 .000 4 .973 2 USC 6-0 2 2621 .000 2 1476 .952 .000 1 .956 3 Michigan 7-0 4 2557 .000 3 1430 .923 .000 20 .934 4 Auburn 6-1 10 1728 .000 7 1122 .724 .000 9 .748 5 West Virginia 6-0 5 2434 .000 4 1411 .910 .000 11 .745 6 Florida 6-1 3 2599 .000 10 1045 .674 .000 17 .738 7 Louisville 6-0 7 2181 .000 6 1205 .777 .000 19 .718 8 Notre Dame 5-1 9 1917 .000 8 1068 .689 .000 6 .694 9 Texas 6-1 6 2246 .000 5 1314 .848 .000 2 .684 10 California 6-1 11 1712 .000 11 981 .633 .000 0 .668 11 Tennessee 5-1 8 1959 .000 9 1060 .684 .000 0 .653 12 Clemson 6-1 12 1499 .000 12 896 .578 .000 0 .504 13 Arkansas 5-1 22 532 .000 18 532 .343 .000 0 .471 14 Oregon 5-1 20 822 .000 15 660 .426 .000 5 .449 15 Boise State 6-0 21 803 .000 17 575 .371 .000 0 .432 16 Rutgers 6-0 24 416 .000 19 415 .268 .000 0 .395 17 Nebraska 6-1 19 830 .000 16 596 .385 .000 0 .354 18 LSU 5-2 16 1035 .000 14 682 .440 .000 12 .350 19 Georgia Tech 5-1 15 1084 .000 13 703 .454 .000 24 .340 20 Boston College 5-1 25 204 .000 21 321 .207 .000 21 .259 21 Wisconsin 6-1 26 194 .000 22 288 .186 .000 18 .254 22 Oklahoma 4-2 23 430 .000 20 354 .228 .000 23 .158 23 Iowa 5-2 13 1244 .000 23 172 .111 .000 0 .070 24 Missouri 6-1 17 914 .000 27 89 .057 .000 0 .680 25 Tulsa 5-1 38 4 .000 - - .000 .000 0 .064 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
after the top 3, who cares [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Well I guess, some irrelevant BCS bowl game bids, but still. |
|
|