Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Sporting Events (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=48)
-   -   BCS Rankings. (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=237050)

ridonkulous 10-15-2006 04:49 PM

BCS Rankings.
 
1. OSU
2. USC
3. Michigan
4. Auburn
5. West Virginia
6. Florida
7. Louisville
8. Notre Dame
9. Texas
10. Cal

xorbie 10-15-2006 04:50 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
notre dame absurdly high.

pirateboy 10-15-2006 04:50 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
Terrible. Teams overrated in preseason polls never get their ranking corrected, and BETTER teams rated lower in preseason polls have to work harder just to come close. Preseason polls are a joke, and thats why the BCS is a joke.

ridonkulous 10-15-2006 04:58 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
Complete List, sorry it doesnt seem to fit well.

BCS Standings
Rk Team W-L Harris Coaches CPU % BCS
Rk Points % Rk Points % Prev Avg
1 Ohio State 7-0 1 2848 .000 1 1575 1.016 .000 4 .973
2 USC 6-0 2 2621 .000 2 1476 .952 .000 1 .956
3 Michigan 7-0 4 2557 .000 3 1430 .923 .000 20 .934
4 Auburn 6-1 10 1728 .000 7 1122 .724 .000 9 .748
5 West Virginia 6-0 5 2434 .000 4 1411 .910 .000 11 .745
6 Florida 6-1 3 2599 .000 10 1045 .674 .000 17 .738
7 Louisville 6-0 7 2181 .000 6 1205 .777 .000 19 .718
8 Notre Dame 5-1 9 1917 .000 8 1068 .689 .000 6 .694
9 Texas 6-1 6 2246 .000 5 1314 .848 .000 2 .684
10 California 6-1 11 1712 .000 11 981 .633 .000 0 .668
11 Tennessee 5-1 8 1959 .000 9 1060 .684 .000 0 .653
12 Clemson 6-1 12 1499 .000 12 896 .578 .000 0 .504
13 Arkansas 5-1 22 532 .000 18 532 .343 .000 0 .471
14 Oregon 5-1 20 822 .000 15 660 .426 .000 5 .449
15 Boise State 6-0 21 803 .000 17 575 .371 .000 0 .432
16 Rutgers 6-0 24 416 .000 19 415 .268 .000 0 .395
17 Nebraska 6-1 19 830 .000 16 596 .385 .000 0 .354
18 LSU 5-2 16 1035 .000 14 682 .440 .000 12 .350
19 Georgia Tech 5-1 15 1084 .000 13 703 .454 .000 24 .340
20 Boston College 5-1 25 204 .000 21 321 .207 .000 21 .259
21 Wisconsin 6-1 26 194 .000 22 288 .186 .000 18 .254
22 Oklahoma 4-2 23 430 .000 20 354 .228 .000 23 .158
23 Iowa 5-2 13 1244 .000 23 172 .111 .000 0 .070
24 Missouri 6-1 17 914 .000 27 89 .057 .000 0 .680
25 Tulsa 5-1 38 4 .000 - - .000 .000 0 .064

lastchance 10-15-2006 05:00 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are.

ridonkulous 10-15-2006 05:01 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
What about Tennessee?

WLVRYN 10-15-2006 05:04 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
Michigan was like 13-15 in preseason polls. I'd say that they have moved up well. I dont really care if we are 2 or 3. Doesnt make a difference as long as we beat OSU next month.

Except for ND probably being too high, I dont have too much problem with the rest of the rankings (though maybe Cal could be higher). The winner of WVa/Louisville will improve when they play each other (as well as Rutgers). SC's ranking will sort itself out when they play Cal and ND.

Dudd 10-15-2006 05:05 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are.

[/ QUOTE ]

Notre Dame is higher in the computers than they are in the polls. Nice try, though.

teamdonkey 10-15-2006 05:06 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are.

[/ QUOTE ]

Harris - 0.680
Coaches - 0.689
Computer - 0.730

it's those damned catholic computers!

ThaSaltCracka 10-15-2006 05:09 PM

Re: BCS Rankings.
 
after the top 3, who cares [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Well I guess, some irrelevant BCS bowl game bids, but still.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.