Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2007, 12:55 PM
Jojje_2k Jojje_2k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: santafish
Posts: 427
Default PartyPoker = best?

Many says that partypoker has the best games because the players are so bad, is that true?

Or are there any other site that has worse players.

Ongame, full tilt , ultimate bet,??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:03 PM
Backspin20 Backspin20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of Boomswich, NJ
Posts: 845
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

no Americans @ party....so what do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:06 PM
Jojje_2k Jojje_2k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: santafish
Posts: 427
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

[ QUOTE ]
no Americans @ party....so what do you think?

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't know if you mean americans are good or bad [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:12 PM
Jojje_2k Jojje_2k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: santafish
Posts: 427
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

I assume that you think americans are bad players so the players on partypoker are not to bad now?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:45 PM
Jojje_2k Jojje_2k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: santafish
Posts: 427
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

Are there worse players at Full Tilt?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:52 PM
dersl dersl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 538
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

only true for the higher stakes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:59 PM
Backspin20 Backspin20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of Boomswich, NJ
Posts: 845
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

Americans overall are better players. Party is prob softer then stars or FT.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-27-2007, 02:07 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
Posts: 9,146
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

[ QUOTE ]
I assume that you think americans are bad players so the players on partypoker are not to bad now?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. No Americans means far fewer players. Far fewer players = far fewer bad players.

The bigger the pool the more likely bad players will play, and the US is the most populous country in the world with extensive internet access. Now maybe in 5 or 10 years India and China will have a high percentage of people with fast internet connections, but until that happens, the US will be the biggest fish tank in the world.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-27-2007, 02:16 PM
Jojje_2k Jojje_2k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: santafish
Posts: 427
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

[ QUOTE ]
Americans overall are better players. Party is prob softer then stars or FT.

[/ QUOTE ]

We who are from Sweden thinks you Americans are fishes [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-27-2007, 02:18 PM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: PartyPoker = best?

If you can play on Party and you don't, you are stupid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.